There are a list of others that make a living from the large expensive housing status quo, for which the notion of tiny houses in their own minds, threatens their livelihood. Especially those in government that have created such complex and expensive real estate policies that require all manner of government employed housing and building inspections and code verifications as well as preferred policies that will employ established government and union workers. We cannot just let people plunk down tiny houses without basic utilities and plumbing, however rules outside current city limits in unincorporated zones would benefit hugely by not being hamstrung by statewide laws pushed by special interests with an agenda of protecting the haves.
"We cannot just let people plunk down tiny houses without basic utilities and plumbing" but laws allow homeless people to throw up a tent or cardboard shelter and crap on the side of the road everywhere except on private property.
Then of course, there's the argument about private vs public property.
For example, I lived in a house owned by my son and, as required by city ordinances and bylaws, home owners are responsible for maintenance and repairs to the section of sidewalk that runs from one side of the home owner's property to the other, as well as the strip of grass (his had a big elm tree on it) between that section of sidewalk and the street. So I mowed, edged and watered that grass strip, and pruned its elm tree as needed, and when a root from the elm caused the sidewalk to crack and become uneven, the city insisted I fix it. So I dug out and removed the offending root, removed the broken bits of sidewalk, bought the cement and some soil and sod, and patched it all up. If I hadn't, my son would have been heavily fined. ...Oh, and I had to buy the freakin' permits, too. (my son paid for those)
BUT if a group of homeless people decided to pitch 5 or 6 tents along that strip or even
on that sidewalk, the city would tell me and my son to leave them alone, and that they have the right to live there....suddenly that's public property. How in the hell do they have laws and ordinances that make home owners physically and financially responsible for maintenance and repairs of public property,
under the threat of fines and charges for non-compliance, yet the home owner has no say about people living on it.
Same with public parks. People in the community pay taxes, the taxes pay for up-keep of public parks, but the tents crop up, and the tent people pee and crap wherever, pile their "collectables" here and there, and do their drugs right out in the open. And in no time, the public can't use the freakin parks their taxes maintain. Especially kids.