What a Stupid, Stupid Boy (Prince Harry)

Jamala said:
There was no need to submit anything. He did not write a formal army document.
Click to expand...
In the U.S., any former soldier who writes anything, fiction or factual, that has information/story line that is military related must be reviewed by the DoD (or the appropriate dept.) so that certain information is not released that shouldn't be. Doesn't the UK have something like that?
 
timoc said:
You are right about one thing, Holly, the whole world knew that an affair took place between Diana and Hewitt, but they were economical with the truth about the time frame of that affair.

As for Charles having the greatest excuse to divorce Diana , did you miss something, Charlieboy was having it off with Camilla at the same time, now that would have been a scream in a divorce court.
No, I firmly believe that the Palace didn't want it known that Harry was not the future King's offspring because it would have made the Royals a complete laughing stock, which they now are.

Harry does have a resemblance to Diana's brother, which is to be expected, because he shares the same bloodline as his mother and her brother, however, Harry is the absolute spitting image of, James Hewitt, take another look at the pictures.


View attachment 261144
Click to expand...
I have never doubted whose son he really was. A DNA should have been done years ago, that would have put the cat amongst the pidgeons. I watched him on tv for a few minutes last night, then turned it off, the arrogance of him makes me sick, he should be reminded of just who he really is.
 

Last edited:
Nathan said:
I disliked Charles and his consort from back when Princess Diana was killed. Over the years that dislike has not changed.
Click to expand...
1997 My late wife & I drove across Canada.....we stopped at her mom's in Ontario...I walked in the kitchen and heard Diana had died.....said "Oh, so we won't have to constantly hear about her any more".

Who knew?
 
I'm not up on the "royals". I can never remember which brother is the heir and which is the spare, or who married who. But whether its ego or the big check, we're in for dueling 'royal' exposes. Ya wanna bet " Camilla, The Untold Story" is in the works.
 
Pepper said:
Harry was born in 1984.
"Anna Pasternak published the book Princess in Love in 1994. Hewitt was a major source, and it alleged that he had a five-year affair with Diana, Princess of Wales[11] from 1986 to 1991."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hewitt

You folks should be in the audience of the Maury Povich show, if that is still on! :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...

Besides that, he looks more and more like Charles as he ages. He has Charles' close set eyes and lump on the upper nose.
 
Lilac said:
In the U.S., any former soldier who writes anything, fiction or factual, that has information/story line that is military related must be reviewed by the DoD (or the appropriate dept.) so that certain information is not released that shouldn't be. Doesn't the UK have something like that?
Click to expand...


Since he did not write the entire book about life in the army or detailed war events. It was a passing comment and that step was not necessary. Seems, although it was very unwise, it was not a breach of any army codes.

Ex-army officer Col Richard Kemp, who was sent to Kabul in 2003 to take command of forces in Afghanistan, told the BBC it was unusual but he did not have a problem with Prince Harry revealing his kill number.

He said soldiers did talk about people they had killed or wounded privately, sometimes as "a way of almost decompressing after a period of combat".

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he would not comment on the appropriateness of the prince's 25 kills claim, but added he was "enormously grateful to our armed forces".
 
I was stupid before I knew what stupid was....lived happily ever-after until the moment of truth arrived when society embraced stupid as the status quo.
 
I was considering getting the book but I have plenty of reading material right now. I'm going to wait for a thrift store copy. I'm sure one will show up.
 
I just watched his 60 minutes interview.
Since his pain was played out in public is it naive to think that his healing may need to take place in public?
Sometimes we need to be selfish to save our own lives.
 
hearlady said:
I just watched his 60 minutes interview.
Since his pain was played out in public is it naive to think that his healing may need to take place in public?
Sometimes we need to be selfish to save our own lives.
Click to expand...
the pain of what ?.. the lies he told about his brother , the lies he told about his sister-in-law, ?.. the boasting and bragging about killing 25 Taliban.. ? what pain..? The pain he's created for other people though his lies... let him Heal that !!
 
hollydolly said:
the pain of what ?.. the lies he told about his brother , the lies he told about his sister-in-law, ?.. the boasting and bragging about killing 25 Taliban.. ? what pain..? The pain he's created for other people though his lies... let him Heal that !!
Click to expand...
I mean the pain of his mother dying.
 
hearlady said:
I just watched his 60 minutes interview.
Since his pain was played out in public is it naive to think that his healing may need to take place in public?
Sometimes we need to be selfish to save our own lives.
Click to expand...

Absolutely correct!
We live in a culture that is blind to betrayal and intolerant of emotional pain.
Yes, you have hit the nail right on the head hearlady.

Harry spoke the truth. He had nothing to hide. It’s time the intrigue and messy secrets at the palace were made public.
.
 
Jamala said:
Since he did not write the entire book about life in the army or detailed war events. It was a passing comment and that step was not necessary. Seems, although it was very unwise, it was not a breach of any army codes.

Ex-army officer Col Richard Kemp, who was sent to Kabul in 2003 to take command of forces in Afghanistan, told the BBC it was unusual but he did not have a problem with Prince Harry revealing his kill number.

He said soldiers did talk about people they had killed or wounded privately, sometimes as "a way of almost decompressing after a period of combat".

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he would not comment on the appropriateness of the prince's 25 kills claim, but added he was "enormously grateful to our armed forces".
Click to expand...

A passing comment that reveals a small amount of military information may still have serious repercussions. Even if the entire book or an interview wasn't about his life in the military, he still released military information. Maybe it's time for rules about releasing military info be reviewed to avoid problems in the future, no matter how small it may seem.

Yes, soldiers do talk about combat. Most are smart enough to keep in amongst their brothers & not hang it out for public view.
 
Jamala said:
I disagree and time will tell when he makes up with his family.
Charles loves Harry and Meghan.
Click to expand...
I'm sure he does but how does a parent bounce back from all these allegations without ostrasizing the rest of his family. I feel that Harry might be forgiven but I am not so sure about Meghan. I hope that they can stay in California and just be a happy family. Reconcilation is not coming anytime soon. IMO
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top