JimBob1952
Senior Member
Sorry, I wasn't directing my comment at you specifically.
Well, then you shouldn't quote my post. I think a diverse gene pool is a blessing, and it's one of the great strengths of the U.S.
Sorry, I wasn't directing my comment at you specifically.
Yep, anyone less than 20 years old, probably has hippy DNA in their genes.Sounds a lot like the 60's , and 70's.
When I was a kid in the 1950's there were only 3 numbers in the Toronto phone directory that had my family name, and they were all related to our family. Now in 2022 there are at least 35 with our family name, none of which are related to me. Our family name has 2 branches, one in England, the other in Ireland. JimB.When a new phone book came out (40 years ago), I got a phone call from 2 people who seemed excited that we had the same (rather unusual) last name. They assumed I'd want to meet them. I said no, I didn't want to meet more people with that name. They seemed shocked.
I happen to like most of my family, but not all. Blood ties per se mean nothing to me.
I never heard the term hybrid vigor, but long ago I learned from a relative who bred/raised dogs that purebreds generally do have a greater risk of serious health problems.Isn't there a biological concept known as "hybrid vigor?" That's why mixed breeds aka mutts make great dogs, and why people from a diverse gene pool might be healthier and smarter than others.
I never heard the term hybrid vigor, but long ago I learned from a relative who bred/raised dogs that purebreds generally do have a greater risk of serious health problems.
My children are half Filipino and half white mixture. I’ve always thought or hoped that they would be stronger because of the combination.Well, then you shouldn't quote my post. I think a diverse gene pool is a blessing, and it's one of the great strengths of the U.S.
My ancestry is similar to yours — Western European. My last name may be an Americanization of a French original.Got back my DNA analysis for the last 500 years. I'm of French-Canadian descent, so there are a lot of Brits and French in me. And my DNA confirms that.
I don't think we are mutts; I prefer to believe we are hybrids.
The French had territory in the Far East, so it's possible that is how you got French/Asian blood in your veins, the British were not the only ones with an Empire.Got back my DNA analysis for the last 500 years. I'm of French-Canadian descent, so there are a lot of Brits and French in me. And my DNA confirms that. But according to my DNA, my ancestors were very familiar with the phrase, " Hey, sailor". You name it and it's in me. With my last name, I had to come from France, so how did that French guy meet somebody from South Asia? And how did that French guy meet a Mexican in 1530? I think there's a 1% chance I'm part Martian. I never expected the diversity in my ancestors. That was a shock. I figured I would come from one tiny French village for generation after generation- apparently it was who was ever walking down the road. Looking at my DNA, it makes concepts like race kind of laughable. I'm a mutt. Anybody else get your DNA?
59 generations back you would have 576,460,752,303,423,488 or so ancestors. That is more, a lot more, people than have ever existed, I am pretty sure. Of course the real number would be smaller, lots of duplication and at that level inbreeding.they went back 59 generations
Many/most? then where did the others come from???59 generations back you would have 576,460,752,303,423,488 or so ancestors. That is more, a lot more, people than have ever existed, I am pretty sure. Of course the real number would be smaller, lots of duplication and at that level inbreeding.
None the less its pretty safe to say you, and I, and all of us have descended from many, if not most people alive 59 generations back...
Hey Cuz!
I assume some of the people alive then did not have children, and there may be places on earth isolated enough that the genes didn't get spread around. None, the less at some level we are all cousins.Many/most? then where did the others come from???
Oh, ok. Thanks for clarifying.I assume some of the people alive then did not have children, and there may be places on earth isolated enough that the genes didn't get spread around. None, the less at some level we are all cousins.
This is a result of testing a certain numbered chromosome which found cells that corresponded to an ancestor back then.59 generations back you would have 576,460,752,303,423,488 or so ancestors. That is more, a lot more, people than have ever existed, I am pretty sure. Of course the real number would be smaller, lots of duplication and at that level inbreeding.
None the less its pretty safe to say you, and I, and all of us have descended from many, if not most people alive 59 generations back...
Hey Cuz!