"the researchers urged protective measures for the elderly in the form of effective vaccines and enhanced physical distancing and infection control."
Enhanced physical distancing???
Get vaccinated and have to stay further then 6ft away? Makes no sense why those over 65 need to keep a further distance after being vaccinated. In the news a few days ago, they were saying grandparents could visit grandchildren once they had received the vaccine? No mention of "enhanced distancing."
Already had COVID? Get the vaccine anyway
The natural immunity provided by a first coronavirus infection is "robust" for relatively young people but not so much for people over 65 – and generally not as good as vaccination, a new study found.
Researchers in Denmark found that 80% or more of the naturally infected population who are younger than 65 were protected against reinfection for at least six months. Good, but not as good as some vaccines that appear to provide more than 90% protection for people with no prior infection.
The researchers also found that previous infection provided less than 50% protection for people 65 years and older. Since that group is also more prone to a "serious clinical course of illness," the researchers urged protective measures for the elderly in the form of effective vaccines and enhanced physical distancing and infection control.
"Furthermore, our data indicate that vaccination of previously infected individuals should be done because natural protection cannot be relied on," the researchers said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...us-variants-vaccines-deaths-cases/4742648001/
Enhanced physical distancing???
Get vaccinated and have to stay further then 6ft away? Makes no sense why those over 65 need to keep a further distance after being vaccinated. In the news a few days ago, they were saying grandparents could visit grandchildren once they had received the vaccine? No mention of "enhanced distancing."
Already had COVID? Get the vaccine anyway
The natural immunity provided by a first coronavirus infection is "robust" for relatively young people but not so much for people over 65 – and generally not as good as vaccination, a new study found.
Researchers in Denmark found that 80% or more of the naturally infected population who are younger than 65 were protected against reinfection for at least six months. Good, but not as good as some vaccines that appear to provide more than 90% protection for people with no prior infection.
The researchers also found that previous infection provided less than 50% protection for people 65 years and older. Since that group is also more prone to a "serious clinical course of illness," the researchers urged protective measures for the elderly in the form of effective vaccines and enhanced physical distancing and infection control.
"Furthermore, our data indicate that vaccination of previously infected individuals should be done because natural protection cannot be relied on," the researchers said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...us-variants-vaccines-deaths-cases/4742648001/
