Answers from Top Epidemiologist Who Predicted the Pandemic

Sobering stuff:

"We can expect COVID-19 to infect 60% – 70% of Americans. That’s around 200 million Americans...We can expect between 800,000 and 1.6 million Americans to die in the next 18 months if we don’t have a successful vaccine."

"But I can say with certainty, what I call the laws of virus physics, is that this is going to continue to transmit until we see a large part of the population infected. When you think about only 5% of this country’s been infected to date, and you understand the pain, the suffering, the death, and economic disruption that’s occurred with just 5%, then you can imagine what it’s going to take for us to get to 60 or 70%. "

Haven't read the whole article, but saving it for when my eyes are rested. Thanks for providing this excellent information!
 

Last edited:
From the OP article:

While it does change genetically over time, it’s still a very stable virus. There’s no evidence that somehow it might just mutate itself away.

That--along with recent stories in the news that there's a potentially more infectious mutation--got me interested in the mutability of coronaviruses and I found this article from Science News. I'd read that coronaviruse mutations are not nearly so dramatic as influenza which undergoes shifting antigen mutations that can cause epidemics quickly blow up in severity or to quickly burn out.

Is the coronavirus mutating? Yes. But here’s why you don’t need to panic

Excerpts:

Viruses are always changing. When a virus infects a cell, it begins making copies of its genetic instructions. Most viruses don’t have the necessary tools to proofread each string of RNA for mistakes, so the process is error-prone and differences build up over time.​
Coronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2, on the other hand, do have a proofreading enzyme — a rarity for RNA viruses. But that doesn’t mean their genomes don’t have errors. Changes still accumulate, just more slowly than in other RNA viruses such as influenza. ā€œStrains,ā€ ā€œvariantsā€ or ā€œlineagesā€ are all terms researchers might use to describe viruses that have identical or closely related strings of RNA.​
But for the general public, a word like ā€œstrainā€ is often interpreted to mean a whole new scourge. ā€œI think the use of the term ā€˜strain’ does little more than cause panic,ā€ says Jeremy Luban, a virologist at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester.​
 

Last edited:

Back
Top