Crazy Headlines or better thoughts

TennVet

Member
I read and hear about inflation, two misunderstood interpretations of the issues in Israel and numerous other issues. Remember when Walter Cronkite simply read the news. He didn't offer his own take on what was going on around the country and indeed the world in general, he just reported about that day's happening. Then some years later Ted Turner fostered a new approach to news with CNN that broadcast 24/7, sometime repetitive, but heck they had 24 full hours that had to be filled.

To my way of thinking that was the snow flurry, that turned to a snow storm, that turned to a blizzard, that brought the current avalanche down on us. Other entrepreneurs saw a golden fleece in news reporting, then cable brought a new dimension. I was in a roundtable meeting in the mid 80's when some AT&T technical speakers were telling us about video text. That morphed into the present day internet monster or blessing, depending on your vantage point.

Instead of dwelling on all those ramifications, I feel pretty comfortable knowing my grandson will be starting his higher education goals at Duke in the fall. There will still be crazy headlines, I'll still reflect on what I consider the integrity of Cronkite in days go by, but I see some light at the end of the tunnel in my children, grandchildren, and now great-grandchildren that have a solid foundation and decent moral compass to rely on.
 

First, is what your seeing on TV is a "news" or "entertainment" program.
Today, it's a blurb of a headline and 59 minutes of biased opinion, which is essentially just entertainment. There are two types of "opinion" networks, MSNBC and Fox, each providing their respective audiences the type of entertainment they seek.
I still think the 6:30 network shows still deliver a "news" product, rather than opinion networks.
 
I agree with the point where you started. It seems like it has morphed away from news into an entertainment realm. In fact I would go so far as to say there is a concerted effort to make it spectacular, many times even outrageous. My approach has been to develop my own filters. I try to read and evaluate information from what I consider competing sources. At the same time I apply those filters to deny the outrageous ones free space in my head. I don't find that in the evening news on the national channels, there is too much bias embedded in editorial policy for me to go there.

I go to some of the online sources, and I don't mean social media. I subscribe to think tank articles on both sides of the editorial line or policies. In addition I have a little placard on my desk, that I got many years ago from goods friends working for IBM. It is just one word, "THINK". If I every imparted anything to my children it was the concept that one should think, applying knowledge they got from a good education and a childhood that gave them a solid foundation of fundamental principles or reason.
 


Back
Top