RandomName
Member
I'll try to condense this. Mom died with a bank account of $50,000. Also stocks worth about $200,000. Stocks had named beneficiaries and were in Mom's name only. Stocks have been disbursed to beneficiaries already.
But the bank account had both my Mom and my sister's names on it. Sister has taken Mom off the account, so is in her name only now. Also had named beneficiaries.
I have been too embarrassed to confront my sister about whether she is legally obligated to disburse the $50,000 to the named beneficiaries (if they are still on the account). She keeps talking about 'getting around to it' as the last part of the inheritance process. She has been spending from the account for expenses of the inheritance, which I am OK with.
She has been doing a good job with it. Her husband is the executor. They both put in a lot of hours and work and hassle getting things done, and I know that an executor can charge a fee for his services. So far no mention of a fee.
What am I asking? I think the reality is that the named beneficiaries were taken off the account when my sister took Mom's name off, so my sister legally can keep all of it. Maybe she made a mental note that she would share it anyway, even though not legally required to.
So far she has just talked about disbursing the $50,000 or whatever is left after expenses, but she hasn't done anything yet. It's the last part of 'estate'. I am 50/50 about whether I should pursue the issue. I want a good relationship with her. But if she keeps it all, I will resent her. I wish she could just be honest about it, and say something like ' the named beneficiaries came off the account, and I'm keeping it all, for expenses and hassle I had working on the inheritance.' But she says nothing.
I am sure the other beneficiaries aren't expecting anything from the bank account, and may not even know it exists.
I suppose I want to just forget about it. My share would have been been 20% of the account, so $10,000.
I don't want to be one of these people who no longer speak to a sibling. Also don't want to be taken advantage of.
But the bank account had both my Mom and my sister's names on it. Sister has taken Mom off the account, so is in her name only now. Also had named beneficiaries.
I have been too embarrassed to confront my sister about whether she is legally obligated to disburse the $50,000 to the named beneficiaries (if they are still on the account). She keeps talking about 'getting around to it' as the last part of the inheritance process. She has been spending from the account for expenses of the inheritance, which I am OK with.
She has been doing a good job with it. Her husband is the executor. They both put in a lot of hours and work and hassle getting things done, and I know that an executor can charge a fee for his services. So far no mention of a fee.
What am I asking? I think the reality is that the named beneficiaries were taken off the account when my sister took Mom's name off, so my sister legally can keep all of it. Maybe she made a mental note that she would share it anyway, even though not legally required to.
So far she has just talked about disbursing the $50,000 or whatever is left after expenses, but she hasn't done anything yet. It's the last part of 'estate'. I am 50/50 about whether I should pursue the issue. I want a good relationship with her. But if she keeps it all, I will resent her. I wish she could just be honest about it, and say something like ' the named beneficiaries came off the account, and I'm keeping it all, for expenses and hassle I had working on the inheritance.' But she says nothing.
I am sure the other beneficiaries aren't expecting anything from the bank account, and may not even know it exists.
I suppose I want to just forget about it. My share would have been been 20% of the account, so $10,000.
I don't want to be one of these people who no longer speak to a sibling. Also don't want to be taken advantage of.