squatting dog
We don't have as far to go, as we've already been
- Location
- Arkansas, and also Florida
Had my 6 month blood work done and got the results yesterday. Good news was most all results were on the good side. Then came the frown and showing me the LDEL cholesterol result. Hmmm, 139 he says. That's in the borderline high range. We better get you on statins. No chance dude. I've studied this thoroughly and found that they keep changing the number. (lowering it of course).
I remembered the article from Dr Joseph Pizzorno a credible source of info... The Vilification of Cholesterol (for Profit?) - PMC
Here's what he said...
The recommended cholesterol levels changed from 300 mg/dL to 200 mg/dL in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Those who have read my editorials over the years will know that I am not a wild-eyed, far-left anticapitalist. Nonetheless, the only justification I can see for the new cholesterol practice management guidelines (discussed below) is to print money for drug companies. Truly, how can anyone think we need to prescribe statins to 50% of the population older than 40?! In order to justify this extreme position, data had to be distorted and cholesterol vilified.
I remembered the article from Dr Joseph Pizzorno a credible source of info... The Vilification of Cholesterol (for Profit?) - PMC
Here's what he said...
The recommended cholesterol levels changed from 300 mg/dL to 200 mg/dL in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Those who have read my editorials over the years will know that I am not a wild-eyed, far-left anticapitalist. Nonetheless, the only justification I can see for the new cholesterol practice management guidelines (discussed below) is to print money for drug companies. Truly, how can anyone think we need to prescribe statins to 50% of the population older than 40?! In order to justify this extreme position, data had to be distorted and cholesterol vilified.