Immediate thought;I agree with you..
But..
I don't accept it.
What do you think?
Sounds like nonsense to me.I agree with you..
But..
I don't accept it.
What do you think?
Sounds like cognitive dissonance.I agree with you..
But..
I don't accept it.
What do you think?
Me too!Sounds like nonsense to me.
Maybe so, if only I knew what that meant...Sounds like cognitive dissonance.
I think I remember this from Social Psych. class, it's basically holding opposite beliefs or ideas simultaneously. People generally try to avoid it because it's uncomfortable to the mind.Me too!
Maybe so, if only I knew what that meant...
Or wanting to appear to have an open mind.If I'm correct, the above isn't true cognitive dissonance, but closer to having an open mind about a given issue.
It is actually possible to truly have an open mind on certain issues. I know I do.Or wanting to appear to have an open mind.
Since the subject here is "your point," that would be what is not agreed with in this scenario. "It, you, your conclusion" are simply synonyms for "the point," in this case. IMHO.How 'bout:
I see your point.....but, I don't agree with ....
it? you? your conclusion?????
My father used to accuse me of confusing an open mind with a hole in my head...It is actually possible to truly have an open mind on certain issues.
Of course it's possible. I didn't suggest that it isn't.It is actually possible to truly have an open mind on certain issues. I know I do.
Makes more sense to me to say "I can accept that, but I disagree."Of course it's possible. I didn't suggest that it isn't.
"...agree...but I don't accept it." That door is shut, isn't it? At best it's a mixed message. I don't even know how one agrees with something but doesn't accept it. Do you have an example where that would work, or even make sense?
This is different than OP's subject how, Murrmurr? I'm genuinely, openly curious about your position on this.Makes more sense to me to say "I can accept that, but I disagree."
For example, you can accept that what someone said to you is what they believe to be true, but it isn't true for you; I can accept that you say the ocean is blue, but I disagree because it appears gray.This is different than OP's subject how, Murrmurr? I'm genuinely, openly curious about your position on this.
Reminds me of a saying......"Its ok to have an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out"My father used to accuse me of confusing an open mind with a hole in my head...
He was never accused of being open minded.
Sorry, I'm just now seeing this.For example, you can accept that what someone said to you is what they believe to be true, but it isn't true for you; I can accept that you say the ocean is blue, but I disagree because it appears gray.
The OP says, I agree with you (iow, your point is correct) but I don't accept it, and, to me, that sounds nonsensical.
iow: in other wordsSorry, I'm just now seeing this.
I don't know what "iow" means (not that savvy with the net lingo). But this is starting to seem more of a linguistics issue than an cognitive one.
I understand.iow: in other words
The OP makes no sense. Like an oxymoron, the phrase contradicts itself. At the very least, it's incongruous. To me it is, anyway, but I'm just saying I don't see how one could agree but not accept. If I don't accept what someone said or pointed out, then it's obvious I don't agree with them.
I can, however, say, Look, I can accept your point (your truth/experience/what you heard), I just can't agree.... for whatever reason; i.e., it's illogical, there's no evidence to support it, I've seen evidence to the contrary, it hasn't ever been my experience ...or whatever.