Heard Of Deep Fake?

fmdog44

Well-known Member
Location
Houston, Texas
Deepfakes (a portmanteau of "deep learning" and "fake" ) are media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with someone else's likeness using artificial neural networks. They often combine and superimpose existing media onto source media using machine learning techniques known as autoencoders and generative adversarial networks (GANs). Deepfakes have garnered widespread attention for their uses in celebrity pornographic videos, revenge porn, fake news, hoaxes, and financial fraud. This has elicited responses from both industry and government to detect and limit their use.
I saw a documentary on this frightening technology "deep fake"and the three young men improving it are somewhat leary of how it will impact all life when they perfect it to the point we ill not be able to tell if the videos are real or not. It was scary to watch them chuckle when asked about the dangers of this. It was like a spoiled brat with his thumb on a nuclear bomb. Think of it overwhelming the internet with phony political figures and words.
 

when I first got my lap top first week or so --someone being a woman had put up a notice on a forum about =her pic was used in
the face book forum -she was deeply upset said she would never put up a pic again of herself and family .wise words I say !!
 

This is about a deep fake and a serious one. Not at all about political sides. This is what we are up against. I will delete it if someone objects.


I was pretty shocked at this one. I saw the first picture and couldn't believe it was really the cover. Well it isn't. It was faked/photoshopped.

GJrVAPJW0AALZet
real one
iu
 
This is about a deep fake and a serious one. Not at all about political sides. This is what we are up against. I will delete it if someone objects.


I was pretty shocked at this one. I saw the first picture and couldn't believe it was really the cover. Well it isn't. It was faked/photoshopped.

GJrVAPJW0AALZet
real one
iu
How can anyone be sure which is photoshop? The picture could be anything I just don't know how, other than trusting some outside source.

I know a lot of pictures are adjusted to make up for shortcomings of the photographer, not to change the subject. Wouldn't that make it difficult to detect using just a software program?
 
Deepfake videos are probably much worse than just photoshopped pictures, because it looks for all the world like the faked person is actually speaking whatever you are hearing him say.
Here is one that shows Anderson Cooper actually speaking, and then a deep fake one of him speaking, but saying that it is really a deep fake, and this one was made with computers . It looks every bit as real as the actual one of Cooper. We have no idea anymore if what we see someone on television saying is actually that person or just a computerized fake.

 
This is about a deep fake and a serious one. Not at all about political sides. This is what we are up against. I will delete it if someone objects.


I was pretty shocked at this one. I saw the first picture and couldn't believe it was really the cover. Well it isn't. It was faked/photoshopped.

GJrVAPJW0AALZet
real one
iu
What’s FJB stand for?
 
when I first got my lap top first week or so --someone being a woman had put up a notice on a forum about =her pic was used in
the face book forum -she was deeply upset said she would never put up a pic again of herself and family .wise words I say !!
I’ve had the same thing happen to me but not on Facebook. I’m not a member.
 
How can anyone be sure which is photoshop? The picture could be anything I just don't know how, other than trusting some outside source.

I know a lot of pictures are adjusted to make up for shortcomings of the photographer, not to change the subject. Wouldn't that make it difficult to detect using just a software program?
Image-analysis software can find any alterations, the dates they where made, and the name of the program (or at least the type of program) used to alter the photo. Digital images are basically readable data.

The FBI, for example, uses Image-analysis software.
 
Last edited:
Image-analysis software can find any alterations, the dates they where made, and the name of the program (or at least the type of program) used to alter the photo. Digital images are basically readable data.

The FBI, for example, uses Image-analysis software.
I understand it's possible, but in your example the FBI becomes the third party. I should have specified saying how could the average person tell if it's real or fake.
 
Image-analysis software can find any alterations, the dates they where made, and the name of the program (or at least the type of program) used to alter the photo. Digital images are basically readable data.

The FBI, for example, uses Image-analysis software.
The FBI, etc can find fakes. The average person can’t. In a recent survey of 2000 people, less than 60% could identify AI generated photos or voices. Scary.
 
Is it really that common?
There must be more for the orange guy!🤭
I hadn't come across it, so I was surprised that it said it was common. It's so messed up when it comes to getting reliable info, and even finding out simple facts these days. The complexities are drowning our curiosity. This is dangerous. The public won't know what to ask in terms of human progress. It will continue to be unfathomable. I think it is designed this way so we remain willing participants is our national identity.
 
I hadn't come across it, so I was surprised that it said it was common. It's so messed up when it comes to getting reliable info, and even finding out simple facts these days. The complexities are drowning our curiosity. This is dangerous. The public won't know what to ask in terms of human progress. It will continue to be unfathomable. I think it is designed this way so we remain willing participants is our national identity.
Now people can use AI to do stuff anonymously? Question mark cause I’m not completely sure.
 
Now people can use AI to do stuff anonymously? Question mark cause I’m not completely sure.
I have no idea how much and what kind of info on us as individuals all the different tech gathers on us. Could be down to your blood type. :) Might be just 1 in billion kind of thing, like a needle in a haystack, never to be found and/or scrutinized. Serious hackers know and pay for the tightest security for themselves. I still don't think the darkest of dark webber's are anonymous totally.
 


Back
Top