Ronni
Well-known Member
- Location
- Nashville TN
I've always been pretty conservative in the way I approached certain activities or decisions in my life. While I like adventure, and fun activities and things that some might consider risky, (like zip lining etc.) still I tend to flinch and shy away from those things that carry with them a higher degree of risk than I'm comfortable with, whether they are financial, physical or logistical.
Risk aversion is usually discussed only in the financial world, I think because the phrase originated there, and was oriented towards the investor who chooses the preservation of capital over the potential for a higher-than-average return. But it's become more mainstream in recent times, and has begun to be used to explain or define more general situations in life.
There's a balance though, because a healthy mind needs something positive to aim towards. You can’t just aim “away” from things. You also need to aim “towards” things. Or else you are too focused on the negative, and that can lead to a less healthy mind-frame. Sometimes I feel like I have a decent balance between the two, but then there are times too when I feel like I spend a lot of time talking myself OUT of things because there's too much uncertainty or danger or, yes, risk, associated with the decision.
But then I argue with myself because I am also aware that if I become too rigid in my thinking, if I limit my failures beyond a certain point, then I'm not growing, expanding, continuing to flex those intellectual and emotional muscles. I don't want to become too annoyingly self-certain, or lose the ability to be fluid and spontaneous. Like I said, it's all about balance and I think I come down on the wrong side of that too often.
What about you? Are you risk-averse or a risk taker?
Risk aversion is usually discussed only in the financial world, I think because the phrase originated there, and was oriented towards the investor who chooses the preservation of capital over the potential for a higher-than-average return. But it's become more mainstream in recent times, and has begun to be used to explain or define more general situations in life.
There's a balance though, because a healthy mind needs something positive to aim towards. You can’t just aim “away” from things. You also need to aim “towards” things. Or else you are too focused on the negative, and that can lead to a less healthy mind-frame. Sometimes I feel like I have a decent balance between the two, but then there are times too when I feel like I spend a lot of time talking myself OUT of things because there's too much uncertainty or danger or, yes, risk, associated with the decision.
But then I argue with myself because I am also aware that if I become too rigid in my thinking, if I limit my failures beyond a certain point, then I'm not growing, expanding, continuing to flex those intellectual and emotional muscles. I don't want to become too annoyingly self-certain, or lose the ability to be fluid and spontaneous. Like I said, it's all about balance and I think I come down on the wrong side of that too often.
What about you? Are you risk-averse or a risk taker?