\
".it is simply the fact that they have to pay it out whether they made a profit or not or risk investors crushing the stock price"
No, its not a fact. All the companies we own do not pay a dividend unless they have money to do so.
Most companies that can not cover their dividend with cash on hand will reduce their dividend...that is SOP>
not all companies make money every year or even for years .
the list of blue chips who pay or paid dividends even when losing money is limitless ..boards never do not pay dividends ever , until the day comes they just about have the nails in the coffin.
Want some names of companies that lost money year after year, yet kept those dividends coming ?
Gm ,Kodak ,Polaroid,Chrysler ,ibm ,Westinghouse , jc penny , radio shack ,Barnes and noble .,Washington mutual,bank of America, RITE AID ,BP OIL ,AIG. FORD , ETC ..I CAN GO ON AND ON .
The dividend stock world is littered with its fair share of recent disasters. The factors that led to the downturn of once mighty dividend payers vary greatly. Some companies simply failed to change with the times, while others have incompetent management to blame. Still others took on massive risks that eventually came back to bite them. Most of these companies exhibited at least one of the following signs before their massive dividend cuts or suspensions , a sharply falling share price, or a lack of dividend raises over a long period of time. By that time it was to late .
Never think dividends being paid have a thing to do with the company being profitable or not .... a rising dividend and rising share price are what determines a company likely doing well , not just paying a dividend out. By the time a dividend is cut the game is usually over for them like many on the list above