Nearly 19,000 NHS patients left waiting for three days in A&E over 12 months

hollydolly

SF VIP
Location
London England
Almost 19,000 NHS patients were left waiting in A&E for three days over a 12-month period, an investigation has revealed.

Between April 2023 and March 2024, nearly 400,000 people were left waiting more than 24 hours across A&E departments, a 5% rise on the previous year. Channel 4’s Dispatches programme also found that 54,000 people had to wait more than two days, a freedom of information request to NHS England found.


The investigation exposed “suffering and indignity faced by patients on a daily basis”, after an undercover reporter secretly filmed himself working as a trainee healthcare assistant inside the emergency department of the Royal Shrewsbury hospital for two months.


The “harrowing” scenes from the hospital’s A&E department came as an analyst from a thinktank said people were dying in emergency care in England “who don’t need to be dying”.

Footage shows one patient waiting for 30 hours in a “fit to sit” area while a suspected stroke sufferer was there for 24 hours, the broadcaster said.

Dr Adrian Boyle, president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, said: “I don’t think this is unique to this hospital by any stretch of the imagination. The things we’ve seen here today are clearly not just confined to winter. It was a year-round crisis in emergency care.

“Spending two days in an emergency department is worse than spending two days in an airport lounge. These are people who are sitting in uncomfortable seats where the lights never go off. There’s constant noise, there’s constant stress. There’s no end in sight.”

Clips from the investigation showed an elderly man forced to urinate in a trolley on the corridor in full view of staff and other patients while in another, a woman is left crying in agony for hours, Channel 4 said.

A total of 18,638 people waited more than three days in A&E over the period, a 60% increase on the previous 12 months. A spokesperson for the hospital trust said: “As with other hospitals, our trust is facing significant challenges with urgent and emergency care.

“We understand our challenges and are investing in our services and making steady improvements as a trust, as noted in our recent CQC report. However, there is still much more to do; we do not want to be in a position where we are caring for patients in corridors.

“We are very sorry that our patients have experienced anything less than the quality care we strive for and we are determined, working with partners, to improve the care and experience for everyone.”

The spokesperson added that although the trust disputed some of the claims made in the Dispatches programme, it would “fully investigate all of the claims to identify and embed any learning into our continuous improvement work”.
Nearly 19,000 NHS patients left waiting for three days in A&E over 12 months
 

Here in the States, the average wait time in the Emergency Room is about 2 1/2 hours, but that varies by state. Maryland has the longest average wait @ over 4 hours. Please note that these are averages. Could not find any info on the longest wait.
 
I saw a lot of that when I was at the hospital with my dying aunt earlier this month. Both major hallways in the Emergency Department lined with gurneys full of people waiting to be seen or waiting for a room.

I kept recognizing the same people; they'd just get shifted up and down the halls.

The ambulances were non-stop pulling in, as this is the "general-hospital" type of place that anyone without insurance shows up at.

The cops showed up several times, too, with people in tow....and in handcuffs.
 
I used to work in an Emergency Room, if we had to admit a patient and the hospital was full, we had to line the corridors with patients.
So, I'm confused by "A&E", does this mean they haven't been seen, or seen and waiting for a bed? How are these people living in "A&E" for 3 days without food, & water? A man had to urinate "in a trolley"?? No bathrooms???
Brits know your health system, we, 'Mericans don't.
 
Here in the States, the average wait time in the Emergency Room is about 2 1/2 hours, but that varies by state. Maryland has the longest average wait @ over 4 hours. Please note that these are averages. Could not find any info on the longest wait.
6 or 7 years back (maybe more), there was a news story about 2 separate incidences of a person who died in a hospital emergency waiting room in New York City. In the USA, that kind of thing hits televised news fast.

One death was an elderly man and the other a lady in her 30s, or thereabout. Amazingly, the old man slid onto the floor and people just walked past him for a couple hours, including ER staffers who "thought he'd fallen asleep". I don't remember how long the patients had been waiting... hours, not days.

The hospital complained they didn't have enough docs and nurses on staff, and the ones they had sometimes didn't show up for their shifts. If I remember right, the director was fired, the administrator was admonished, and all area hospitals were put on notice; they had to either send back-up docs and nurses whenever requested, and stat, or accept transfer of the ER patients from that hosp when wait times might exceed 45 minutes or something.

Plus, the hosp was ordered to improve their triage, and to change their policy so that LPNs and even PHNs could do initial assessments and treatments of minor complaints. The hosp didn't allow that before, to avoid lawsuits.

There was a shortage of doctors in that part of NYC at that time.
 
I used to work in an Emergency Room, if we had to admit a patient and the hospital was full, we had to line the corridors with patients.
So, I'm confused by "A&E", does this mean they haven't been seen, or seen and waiting for a bed? How are these people living in "A&E" for 3 days without food, & water? A man had to urinate "in a trolley"?? No bathrooms???
Brits know your health system, we, 'Mericans don't.
A&E accident and Emergency ( department)...
 
6 or 7 years back (maybe more), there was a news story about 2 separate incidences of a person who died in a hospital emergency waiting room in New York City. In the USA, that kind of thing hits televised news fast.

One death was an elderly man and the other a lady in her 30s, or thereabout. Amazingly, the old man slid onto the floor and people just walked past him for a couple hours, including ER staffers who "thought he'd fallen asleep". I don't remember how long the patients had been waiting... hours, not days.

The hospital complained they didn't have enough docs and nurses on staff, and the ones they had sometimes didn't show up for their shifts. If I remember right, the director was fired, the administrator was admonished, and all area hospitals were put on notice; they had to either send back-up docs and nurses whenever requested, and stat, or accept transfer of the ER patients from that hosp when wait times might exceed 45 minutes or something.

Plus, the hosp was ordered to improve their triage, and to change their policy so that LPNs and even PHNs could do initial assessments and treatments of minor complaints. The hosp didn't allow that before, to avoid lawsuits.

There was a shortage of doctors in that part of NYC at that time.
we have a massive shortage of Doctors and nursing staff... but most of all we have a massive shortage of hospitals. So many people die now before being seen by a doctor or admitted into a ward that it doesn't even make local news...
 
we have a massive shortage of Doctors and nursing staff... but most of all we have a massive shortage of hospitals. So many people die now before being seen by a doctor or admitted into a ward that it doesn't even make local news...
Medical insurance companies build a lot of the hospitals in the US. Medical universities build hospitals, too. I lived in a small town whose local merchants donated the money to build the hospital. There are also state and county hospitals, built with state and county tax revenue. Some religious groups build them, as well, but those are the fewest. Almost all of them treat patients who aren't their religion, which is cool.

This is probably an advantage of not having a national healthcare system.
 
Medical insurance companies build a lot of the hospitals in the US. Medical universities build hospitals, too. I lived in a small town whose local merchants donated the money to build the hospital. There are also state and county hospitals, built with state and county tax revenue. Some religious groups build them, as well, but those are the fewest. Almost all of them treat patients who aren't their religion, which is cool.

This is probably an advantage of not having a national healthcare system.
yes there are many drawbacks of not having a National health service, but there are also many advantages...
 
There was a shortage of doctors in that part of NYC at that time.
I believe at least one took place in Kings County Hospital, if not both. This is a city cesspool. There is not now, or ever been, a shortage of doctors in NYC; Kings County is a different matter, as well as Lincoln in the Bronx & Bellevue. All city hospitals. Overall, there is a GLUT of doctors in NYC.
 
I believe at least one took place in Kings County Hospital, if not both. This is a city cesspool. There is not now, or ever been, a shortage of doctors in NYC; Kings County is a different matter, as well as Lincoln in the Bronx & Bellevue. All city hospitals. Overall, there is a GLUT of doctors in NYC.
I can't remember if someone at the hospital said doctor shortage, or if it was a journalist making assumptions. I do remember them reporting that it was a bad area...and Kings County rings a bell. Maybe the issue was that not enough doctors were willing to work there..? I don't remember the finer details.

They showed video from the hospital's security cam, which was right there in the waiting room. I think the old man went into cardiac arrest. He just slid out of his chair and died. If I remember right, the lady had a traumatic injury...shot or stabbed or something.
 
A lot of people seeking emergency medical treatment have non-emergency conditions that take time away from doctors who could be attending to more urgent cases. Like the woman that rushed in because her son skinned his knee. If I skinned m y knee, my mom would scrub it with soap and water, spray it with disinfectant and send me back out to play. Some people have what I call "medical entitlement."
 
yes there are many drawbacks of not having a National health service, but there are also many advantages...
Our federal gov't is terrible at running things. But that isn't at all what it was designed for....quite the opposite; our gov't was designed to give its people the freedom to run things.

If we had a national healthcare system, it would absolutely suck. Like all federal programs, there'd be way too much bureaucracy, far too little oversight, and $billions in misdirected funds. And even worse, crucial medical studies and research would come to an abrupt halt.
 
A lot of people seeking emergency medical treatment have non-emergency conditions that take time away from doctors who could be attending to more urgent cases. Like the woman that rushed in because her son skinned his knee. If I skinned m y knee, my mom would scrub it with soap and water, spray it with disinfectant and send me back out to play. Some people have what I call "medical entitlement."
here it's the opposite way around. Our A&E depts' are overwhelmed with minor cases preventing serious cases from being seen, because we have critical shortage of general practitioners...
 
Our federal gov't is terrible at running things. But that isn't at all what it was designed for....quite the opposite; our gov't was designed to give its people the freedom to run things.

If we had a national healthcare system, it would absolutely suck. Like all federal programs, there'd be way too much bureaucracy, far too little oversight, and $billions in misdirected funds. And even worse, crucial medical studies and research would come to an abrupt halt.
...and that is precisely what's happened to it in the last few years which is why it's gone down the pan....
 
Douglas Murray said on the ARC conference: "In one important degree the NHS is a world leader in killing the elderly. It's just that they only kill the people who don't want to die. Yet of course none of us can find a GP appointment ..."

In the video from 5:55.

 
Our federal gov't is terrible at running things. But that isn't at all what it was designed for....quite the opposite; our gov't was designed to give its people the freedom to run things.

If we had a national healthcare system, it would absolutely suck. Like all federal programs, there'd be way too much bureaucracy, far too little oversight, and $billions in misdirected funds. And even worse, crucial medical studies and research would come to an abrupt halt.

The government does not run the NHS. It funds the NHS.

In an act to more greatly privatize the functions of the NHS, we have fallen foul of what happens in the US system - profit before patients. This is most easily seen in the ambulance service. This is effectively run privately in some areas (mine included) and it's non-optimal.

Many parts of the NHS have been privatized to bad effect. Dentistry, mental health, and Phamarcy among them. The NHS is a mish-mash of things.

Still, having lived in both the US and UK, I have to say, the UK is a system to be proud of.
 
The government does not run the NHS. It funds the NHS.

In an act to more greatly privatize the functions of the NHS, we have fallen foul of what happens in the US system - profit before patients. This is most easily seen in the ambulance service. This is effectively run privately in some areas (mine included) and it's non-optimal.

Many parts of the NHS have been privatized to bad effect. Dentistry, mental health, and Phamarcy among them. The NHS is a mish-mash of things.

Still, having lived in both the US and UK, I have to say, the UK is a system to be proud of.
Considering Holly's medical appointment and surgery posts here and the ones from friends in the UK - we are just fine her in Oklahoma. At least we do not have to bring a cot.
 
Generally, in our emergency rooms, non life threatening cases are given low priority and might wait 6 or 8 hours. But we also have “Urgent Care” where even low priority cases are seen in 3 hours or less. And if you pick the right time and Urgent Care location, you can get care within the hour.
 
Generally, in our emergency rooms, non life threatening cases are given low priority and might wait 6 or 8 hours. But we also have “Urgent Care” where even low priority cases are seen in 3 hours or less. And if you pick the right time and Urgent Care location, you can get care within the hour.
The two trauma hospitals within five miles give estimated ER wait times for non emergency visits. It has not been over an hour in the eight years we have lived here.

Urgent care as in hospital satellite clinics and doc in the box as in pharmacy affiliated are almost as many as beauty shops and dispensaries. I went once with a bad cold and SO when he sliced a hand. No wait.

Our primary will fit emergencies in. Just call first.
 
The government does not run the NHS. It funds the NHS.
Workers fund the NHS, yes? And a gov't agency regulates and oversees its spending. The NHS submits an annual report to that gov't agency, and the agency can increase or decrease funding, approve or deny programs the NHS proposes, propose programs they would like the NHS to adopt, and mandate programs or actions that the NHS must adopt.

Moreover, any tax-funded public service can be reformed, reorganized, replaced, merged with other services, placed under a different "umbrella", and/or completely shut down by the gov't.

That's what I meant by government-run.
 
Universal Health Care can sometimes limit patient care, but compared to our "for Profit" system, I think we would be better off with a UHC system. If you look at global statistics, We pay twice as much for health care in the US, compared to most UHC nations, and the web sites that rank the global health care systems rank the US between 35 and 70 in terms of value of care received for the costs.
 


Back
Top