JonDouglas
Senior Member
- Location
- New England
One of the more insane aspects of the covid19 screw-up was the demand for masking without having done any serious testing as to its efficacy, especially with respect to children. Now, there's a study in the AMA journal that speaks to the issue. The study is titled Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children - A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Edit Note: I just remembered a discussion I had with a PA who said there were issues with mask CO2 poisoning among the staff in the medical office where I go for my annual physical. I shudder to think about what affect CO2 poisoning and other biohazards would have on a child's longer term development. Then, of course, there's the same issue for you if you're still masking.
Many governments have made nose and mouth covering or face masks compulsory for schoolchildren. The evidence base for this is weak.1,2 The question whether nose and mouth covering increases carbon dioxide in inhaled air is crucial. A large-scale survey3 in Germany of adverse effects in parents and children using data of 25 930 children has shown that 68% of the participating children had problems when wearing nose and mouth coverings.
The normal content of carbon dioxide in the open is about 0.04% by volume (ie, 400 ppm). A level of 0.2% by volume or 2000 ppm is the limit for closed rooms according to the German Federal Environmental Office, and everything beyond this level is unacceptable.4
More at source.
People should ask why the government didn't study this before experimenting on our children for a virus that mostly doesn't affect them. People should ask why masking was a public recommendation while it was privately known as being mostly ineffective, if not dangerous. Potential carbon dioxide poisoning is but one side effect that needs to be studied. Last month, a group of Alachua County, Florida, parents had their children's masks cultured in a lab and found dangerous pathogens growing on them. Where are the studies on microbiological hazards of masking? Have people let themselves and their children become lab rats for big money/government interests? It's a question work asking.Edit Note: I just remembered a discussion I had with a PA who said there were issues with mask CO2 poisoning among the staff in the medical office where I go for my annual physical. I shudder to think about what affect CO2 poisoning and other biohazards would have on a child's longer term development. Then, of course, there's the same issue for you if you're still masking.
Last edited: