Lon
Well-known Member
- Location
- Central California
Time magazine offered Albert Einstein, but Charles Krauthammer in his book "Things That Matter" thinks the only possible answer is WINSTON CHURCHILL and gives some very interesting reasons why.
Difficult, but I think it must be Queen Victoria.
Her world influence continued, through her descendants, long after her death, and in Europe even longer.
Difficult, but I think it must be Queen Victoria.
Her world influence continued, through her descendants, long after her death, and in Europe even longer.
To be honest, if we're looking for those who had most influence on the world right up today, Adolf Hitler must be in the running.
Many of today's European borders are the result of his machinations, and if he had not existed neither would the EU in its current form.
I doubt that US foreign policy would have followed the same course, and the state of Israel probably not exist.
_Wrong century, though. Time Magazine Person of the (last) Century - 1900s.
And I'm sure they don't mean this century.
Here's are just a few reasons Churchill should not be Person of the Century. Most Americans only know about him and WWII, not other things he did as PM.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29701767
_
Yes, but she lived in the last century.
For a year. Didn't she die in 1900, or 1901?
Were there two queens named Victoria?
I'll look it up.