I have been reading in the papers and online that Gascon is another zero bail Prosecutor. I don’t know much about the law, but I always thought the judge decided if a prisoner or suspect deserved bail. I think NYC is doing the same thing. Where did this all come from?LAPD's job just got harder..."thanks Ohio".
Don’t they have to have an extradition hearing? How would they know that he wouldn’t go on the run while he was waiting on his hearing?Hard to say, maybe the Ohio courts figured that since the charges were not local, they wouldn't be bothered, although Ohio authorities did arrest the suspect on a L.A. County warrant, so....???
I would have thought so. The article was a bit thin on details.Don’t they have to have an extradition hearing?
I have been reading in the papers and online that Gascon is another zero bail Prosecutor. I don’t know much about the law, but I always thought the judge decided if a prisoner or suspect deserved bail. I think NYC is doing the same thing. Where did this all come from?
It’s getting to be a crazy world out there.
It kind of sounds to me that as long as he stays out of California, he may be home free? I don’t know how the law works in these situations.
Here’s what I had read.The Judge sets bail not the Prosecutor. For lesser crimes traffic/misdemeanor's there is usually a set bail schedule, before seeing a Judge. Zero bail seems like and idiot move, since CA was charging him was with felonies. Not to up on Uniform Extradition procedures, but the requesting state, here CA, must extradite within 30 days.
I'm sure the warrant was Extradictable for Nationwide status, even if it wasn't, Ohio can still arrest him as a Fugitive from another state under Ohio law.