eddieo45
New Member
Hi (fellow) seniors! My second post after my introduction; thanks for having me! I turned 65 in December and dutifully signed up for Medicare Part A/B, but I'm still working, as is my wife, and our primary health insurance is through her employer. She'll turn 63 next week (let's just keep that between us, lol), and she recently started speculating as to when she might be ready to "stop working", i.e. stop collecting salary! She said the end of 2025 seems about right, and initially I was ready to take that ball and run with it. I'll be 67 then, and I think that means I will qualify for my "full" Social Security benefit, but she will be 64 and 7 months; doesn't that mean she won't yet qualify for Medicare?
I work in a milestone-driven industry, so I tend to think primarily about what's at the next juncture. First and foremost I understand I cannot sensibly start collecting SS, or take withdrawals from my tax-deferred retirement accounts until she stops working or we still will be in an onerous tax bracket. But now I'm realizing that if she retires on New Years Eve 2025 she won't have any health insurance until she hits 65 in May '26 and gets Medicare. It only now occurs to me that at age 65 in May '26 she still won't be eligible for her "full" Social Security benefit, as the full retirement age for those born after 1960 is 67.
Not that SS is that big a part of my financial planning, but the five months without health insurance (for her) seems like a dumb move. Thoughts??
I work in a milestone-driven industry, so I tend to think primarily about what's at the next juncture. First and foremost I understand I cannot sensibly start collecting SS, or take withdrawals from my tax-deferred retirement accounts until she stops working or we still will be in an onerous tax bracket. But now I'm realizing that if she retires on New Years Eve 2025 she won't have any health insurance until she hits 65 in May '26 and gets Medicare. It only now occurs to me that at age 65 in May '26 she still won't be eligible for her "full" Social Security benefit, as the full retirement age for those born after 1960 is 67.
Not that SS is that big a part of my financial planning, but the five months without health insurance (for her) seems like a dumb move. Thoughts??