Google staff arrested after staging 8 hour occupation of office in anti-Israel protest

hollydolly

SF VIP
Location
London England
Several Google workers were arrested Tuesday after staging sits-ins at the company’s offices in New York City and California to protest the tech giant’s contract with the Israeli government.

A total of nine protestors were arrested across both locations on Tuesday. Staffers on the Sunnyvale campus were livestreaming their protest to Twitch when another employee walked in around the eighth hour.

'We'd like to see if you could just voluntarily - it's been a while, so, can you do that for us?' the man asked, urging them to clear out the space and contact HR.

'Could you get in contact with TK about this?' one woman responded, referring to Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian, whose office they were sitting in.

When the workers refused to leave, a stream of police officers filed in and instructed them to put their hands behind their backs.
Hundreds of people watched online as the employees were taken into custody. Video posted to social media shows police leading them out of the Sunnyvale office in handcuffs.

'Physically impeding other employees’ work and preventing them from accessing our facilities is a clear violation of our policies, and we will investigate and take action,' a Google spokesperson told The Washington Post.

'These employees were put on administrative leave, and their access to our systems was cut. After refusing multiple requests to leave the premises, law enforcement was engaged to remove them to ensure office safety.'

Demonstrators entered the offices in New York and California Tuesday afternoon, vowing to remain seated until Google pulled out of its $1.2 billion contract with Israel.

Under the 2021 agreement, known as Project Nimbus, Google and Amazon jointly provide AI and cloud computing services across branches of the Israeli government.

While the contract faced some pushback at the time of its inception, protests have only intensified amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict that has seen over 30,000 Palestinian civilians killed.

In December, employees staged a 'die-in' outside one of Google's offices in San Francisco, bringing traffic to a standstill as they chanted and waved flags at a busy intersection.

Just last month, the tech giant fired an engineer who protested during a keynote speech by the managing director of Google’s Israel business.


83764093-13319193-image-a-1_1713364603963.jpg

83764109-13319193-image-a-6_1713364647245.jpg

Google staffers are arrested after 'no tech for apartheid' protest
 

How dare these people confuse corporate practice for profit with a social conscience. How ridiculous. How is the Google Cloud CEO supposed to drink his coffee when his office space is occupied by miscreants?

Google's own ethic statement says: "Google's Code of Conduct emphasizes ethical behavior, personal responsibility and business integrity for all employees". But let's not get carried away and try to apply it to real world problems.

The staff involved? Well, they'll all be fired, of course.
 

Looks like a professionally printed banner. Probably took more than everyone pitching in a few bucks and sending someone to a capable printer. WHO paid for it. WHO said protest today?
 
one of the 9 who were arrested, clearly....
And was 'one' of following somebody else's directive? I'm not buying these are organic. Professional protesting happens with a lot of issues frequently funded by either side of the argument.

Stopping people from working is just as bad as the bridge and highway protesters from getting to work. At certain point the form and timing a protest becomes a burden to the primary issue.
 
And was 'one' of following somebody else's directive? I'm not buying these are organic. Professional protesting happens with a lot of issues frequently funded by either side of the argument.

Stopping people from working is just as bad as the bridge and highway protesters from getting to work. At certain point the form and timing a protest becomes a burden to the primary issue.
why are you asking me..I know as much as anyone else reading the article
 
How dare these people confuse corporate practice for profit with a social conscience. How ridiculous. How is the Google Cloud CEO supposed to drink his coffee when his office space is occupied by miscreants?

Google's own ethic statement says: "Google's Code of Conduct emphasizes ethical behavior, personal responsibility and business integrity for all employees". But let's not get carried away and try to apply it to real world problems.

The staff involved? Well, they'll all be fired, of course.

OK, nowI get it and will add in the comment below.

I don’t use Google for much of anything these days after reading some comments made by high level managers who seem to think they have superior knowledge and morality than the rest of us.
 
Last edited:
I am sorry you think the staff should be fired. Isn’t that a bit extreme? How about just acknowledging that people have different opinions about what is ethical and what isn’t. Don’t be so quick to dismiss real world problems. They are after all ’real’.

Sorry, perhaps my sarcasm didn't translate.

That said, yes I think they'll be fired.
 
And now comes the go-fund-me pages for these pooor folks
who were mistreated by their employer!!!!!
I wouldn't bet on that some of those bridge protestors are being bailed out by third party organizations.

I know when we protested as a union was always told if it was union sanctioned disobedience they would bail you out and provide a lawyer if need be.
 
Misguided youth.

What was the age range of the people involved? In a way I have to applaud their willingness to protest for something they clearly believe in. If they simply wanted to be heard, then they achieved their goal, imo. Our freedoms mean protest is a legitimate action to take, especially given the hypocrisy of Google's ethics statement.

I agree. And I'll add hive mind.

How so? They're a group of people who work together, and have strong enough beliefs they were willing to protest. Are we calling any group of people with the same belief a "hive mind" now?


Inevitable.
 
Yes, as long as your protest doesn't violate other people's rights...to work, for example.

I am sure Google didn't totally close down because of a handful of protestors. If we didn't allow protests that violate other peoples rights, women wouldn't be able to vote. There's far too much complaining about "our rights" these days, and too little discussion about things that truly matter. Who lost out because of this current event, truly?
 
So your Constitution is only 'situational'? Must make it difficult then to set down laws.
It does, indeed. For example, no law can impede the right of the people to pursue happiness.

That's a tough one, right? You have to define happiness. You have to decide if that particular pursuit is harmful to anyone in any way, or if it means having to create or change other laws, or requires amending the constitution cuz the times they are a-changin', or whatever.

Protecting this group without in any way impeding, impinging on, or violating the rights of another is a very difficult balancing act. And sometimes our lawmakers fail. Fortunately, there's a specific court and a process for fixing their mistakes. Takes years sometimes, but it's totally do-able.

Protesting is one way, but there are wrong ways to go about that, like what happened at Google.

(@VaughanJB ) Unless you have permission, you cannot protest inside a business office, or block people's commute to work like the fossil fuel protesters do, or block a sidewalk or a bike path, or protest on someone's lawn or on their farm or inside someone's car or on any federal property - you pick a street or a street corner or a public park or parking lot...

Somewhere outside a business office, sure, as long as it's so-many feet away from the employee entrance and emergency exits and fire escapes. If there happened to be a fire or an unrelated medical emergency, could that crowd have slowed down an urgent response? Yes! Could they have been held accountable for that, or even financially liable or criminally responsible? Absolutely.

Those protesters were protected from those kind of consequences and they don't even realize it.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top