Nothing that I could do would change anything. I would not be allowed to park a mule in front of my condo, and an electric car would not work logistically.
I believe there are a lot of ideas/proposals that are grossly impractical. I fear what dumb ideas might be hatched in Washington.
Can I both agree and disagree with you at the same time(?)
It has to be true, that once someone, (or perhaps most people), accept, or assume made made climate change is real, that a solution to something "man made" is soluble, (at least if action is taken before a "tipping point" is reached, if it hasn't already.
The threat to be dealt with somehow, the degree of action needed in proportion to the best assessment of the level of threat, all this could lead anyone of us, given we had unlimited and untrammeled power over the whole world, and everyone in/on it!
You may remember the "Single child policy" followed by the totalitarian communist regime in China thirty or forty years ago, (a policy much lauded in the West I seem to remember).
What an impact such a drastic measure would have if imposed on every single couple wishing to start a family, (I can't think of a policy likely to create as much benefit to planet earth, were it all we wanted to consider). I'd be against such an extreme policy, even though I can see the perfect logic of "Less people = Less emissions".
However, as stated in OP, I'm far too swamped with other issues life has thrown at me to even bother too much about such an obviously overriding threat to our beautiful world, and all that's in it, (ridiculous I know!).
