New Blood Test May Be Up to 94% Accurate in Finding Alzheimer's Brain Changes

SeaBreeze

Endlessly Groovin'
Location
USA
A new blood test for Alzheimer's Disease brain changes may be up to 94% accurate for early detection. Would you take it if it was available?

"One challenge in developing a treatment for Alzheimer’s lies in that by the time symptoms occur, brain neurons have already been damaged, perhaps beyond repair. And once neural connections are compromised, they aren’t likely to reform or rebuild. Drug treatments that start after people report declines in their thinking skills may simply be too little too late.

That’s why there’s strong interest in developing a reliable way to identify Alzheimer’s patients as early as possible, years or even decades before their memories start to fade. Researchers are investigating a number of promising markers that appear in the blood that could be useful in tracking Alzheimer’s.

Some of the most encouraging of this work centers on amyloid, the protein that is the hallmark of the disease. Current methods of testing for amyloid, including taking samples of cerebrospinal fluid and PET imaging of the brain, are expensive, time consuming and, in the case of the spinal fluid samples, invasive. That limits the number of people who get tested; having a blood test would potentially allow more people at risk of developing Alzheimer’s to learn of their status."



https://time.com/5641602/blood-test...finding-people-with-alzheimers-brain-changes/
 

Not unless a cure for this scourge was available. Also, medical tests, even those deemed infallible, can certainly fail, giving false negatives and positives, and that would be too terrible to even contemplate. If I start whacking out, forgetting things I've known, cold, I'll know, and do what must be done, as I see it.
 
I wouldn't trust the test's accuracy. Notice the careful wording: "May be up to 94% accurate." Whoever is selling the test is well aware that many people won't interpret the wording correctly & focus on that "94%" number & run to take the test because they think it's accurate.
If the test is positive, it will cause lots of needless stress...due to a test that "MAY BE UP TO 94% accurate. 0% is "up to" 94%. 2% is "up to" 94%. And, note the (safe) word, "May."

"Slowing or Preventing Alzheimer's?" I wouldn't blame desperate people for trying anything.
 
Yes, in fact it ought to be compulsory for those of a certain age. I think doctors should also try to discover why this problem is on the increase. People have always suffered from a mental weakness as they age but not on the scale happening nowadays. We need to know what it is in our modern life-style which is causing it.
 
Yes, in fact it ought to be compulsory for those of a certain age. I think doctors should also try to discover why this problem is on the increase. People have always suffered from a mental weakness as they age but not on the scale happening nowadays. We need to know what it is in our modern life-style which is causing it.

Compulsory? No way! Few tests are 100% accurate. There is a chance one is given false results, and this test is only 94% accurate. Imagine what would happen to someone getting a false positive or negative. Terrible!

As for the causes of increases in dementia: Take a breath outside, drink a glass of water from the tap, eat a nice helping of heavily processed food. No doubts in my mind that WE are the cause! We want our automobiles, we want our heavy industrialized society, we want the latest conveniences.........
 
Without a helpful treatment or cure, I wouldn't take this test. If I develop Alzheimer's, my family and I will know that soon enough. In the meantime I have no desire to obsess over every mental lapse using the prism of Alzheimer's, whether that's a misplaced key or momentarily forgetting a movie star's name.
 
Absolutely would take it. But should not be compulsory. The entire issue of testing and publishing results is the next-big-thing in social science. We can do all kinds of genetic testing, but the issue of discrimination will be at the forefront. It's going to happen --- I have no idea how our societies will deal with being able to predict all kinds of future medical conditions.
 
Yes, in fact it ought to be compulsory for those of a certain age. I think doctors should also try to discover why this problem is on the increase. People have always suffered from a mental weakness as they age but not on the scale happening nowadays. We need to know what it is in our modern life-style which is causing it.
"Compulsory?" Well, that should be interesting - trying to force people to undergo a medical procedure....and a useless one, at that.
 
Without a helpful treatment or cure, I wouldn't take this test. If I develop Alzheimer's, my family and I will know that soon enough. In the meantime I have no desire to obsess over every mental lapse using the prism of Alzheimer's, whether that's a misplaced key or momentarily forgetting a movie star's name.
That's pretty much the way I see it StarSong, and I had someone in my family die with Alzheimer's.
 
Without a helpful treatment or cure, I wouldn't take this test. If I develop Alzheimer's, my family and I will know that soon enough. In the meantime I have no desire to obsess over every mental lapse using the prism of Alzheimer's, whether that's a misplaced key or momentarily forgetting a movie star's name.
Well said. I experience that occasionally. Last year, I was watching an old movie with Sammy Davis Jr. For a few hours, I couldn't remember his name. Really frustrating....and I'm 66.
I remember a neurologist talking about Alzheimer's. He said "Forgetting where you put your car keys is not Alzheimer's. Forgetting what the car keys are for may be."
 
I just told that to someone who was anxious about developing Alzheimer's because she couldn't find where she put something. Lately scientists are scaring people into believing stuff like that is actually early senility. Makes me angry. This poor woman looked haggard and truly scared. Dammit.
 
Every week I take a cool on line quiz. You all know the type. About 15 questions on a particular topic. Random trivia about bubble gum one week, Groundhog Day facts for another, US Founding Fathers the next. After finishing the quiz I read the answers to the questions I missed - there's no explanation given to the missed questions, just the answers. The entire exercise takes about five minutes, and then I get on with my day.

I place little importance on that score. However, I retake the test later the same day to verify my ability to learn and retain new information. This means not only remember the answers to questions I missed, but also recalling the lucky and unlucky guesses.

So far, so good.
 


Back
Top