I think there are certainly several news sources that are 'balanced'. And there is also VoteSmart which is I guess would be called bi-partisan.
I used to be a member of a tiny YouTube news show that did things like split screen one half showing video of actual event and other screen showing politician saying what happened (totally different!). But they became bigger and more polarized so I quit being a member.
Walter Cronkite reported during the time of the fairness act, I found this info on wikipedia:
"
The
fairness doctrine of the United States
Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of
broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was honest, equitable, and balanced. The FCC eliminated the policy in 1987 and removed the rule that implemented the policy from the
Federal Register in August 2011.
[1]
The fairness doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of
public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows, or editorials. The doctrine did not require equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be presented. The demise of this FCC rule has been considered by some to be a contributing factor for the rising level of
party polarization in the United States.
[2][3]
"