Just as with the Floyd case, when a suspect is already handcuffed, any injury is criminal. Unfortunately, there are different laws for criminal cops.How about this one:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-...police-encounter-refiles-suit-against-n639351
From that story, the thin blue line is straight. Police chief in cahoots.
"In April, Madison Police Chief Larry Muncey was found guilty of criminal contempt for discussing testimony with Parker’s colleagues during his first trial. Muncey, who was placed on administrative leave, was ordered to pay a $2,500 fine and attend training for legal exposure and liability."
Cop was only charged with a misdemeanor for paralyzing the grandfather who had committed no crime. Got off Scot Free!
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-...artially-paralyzed-indian-grandfather-n573806
It's racial profiling plain but not so simple. As we know, sometimes it ends with the death of the innocent person (people). I doubt the Supreme Court will do anything about this. If they ever do, frankly I'll be surprised. You're right, if a cop is feeling challenged by someone who insists on their rights and the cop is particularly mean and/or arrogant, to show "who's boss" it's possible that you as a White man could be mistreated as best and injured at worst. We shouldn't have to feel this way when in the presence of police officers!We had an unbelievable incident a few years ago where a black couple was pulled over for a broken taillight (as I recall). The police then decided that there might be drugs in the car so they brought in the dogs who found nothing, but the police then did a cavity search on both of them anyway. Right there in broad daylight on a public road.
I don't have any idea what it cost our town to shut this down. But as an older white male, I have come to understand that if it can happen to an innocent black couple, it can certainly happen to me.
This kind of behavior and the impunity that covers it up needs to stop immediately. By now it is clear that individual states are incapable of taking the required steps. It really bothers me that the Supreme Court has not stepped into this issue.
We had an unbelievable incident a few years ago where a black couple was pulled over for a broken taillight (as I recall). The police then decided that there might be drugs in the car so they brought in the dogs who found nothing, but the police then did a cavity search on both of them anyway. Right there in broad daylight on a public road.
I don't have any idea what it cost our town to shut this down. But as an older white male, I have come to understand that if it can happen to an innocent black couple, it can certainly happen to me.
This kind of behavior and the impunity that covers it up needs to stop immediately. By now it is clear that individual states are incapable of taking the required steps. It really bothers me that the Supreme Court has not stepped into this issue.
These two officers are charged with rape and witness tampering. One drugged his victims via their drinks and the other. And about the headline of this piece...is there any other kind of rape than "forcible rape"?
https://lawandcrime.com/police/two-...cer-charged-with-thwarting-the-investigation/
That is defined in MO law as follows, it's the "Date rape drug" provision. Different elements can create separate crimes. That way it's possible, if applicable, to charge a person with rape under 2 or more statutes, as long as each has an element the other does not, under the Federally named "Blockburger doctrine."
https://law.justia.com/codes/missouri/2005/t38/5660000030.html
Ahhh. Thank you Ohioboy. It's good to learn something new everyday!That is defined in MO law as follows, it's the "Date rape drug" provision. Different elements can create separate crimes. That way it's possible, if applicable, to charge a person with rape under 2 or more statutes, as long as each has an element the other does not, under the Federally named "Blockburger doctrine."
https://law.justia.com/codes/missouri/2005/t38/5660000030.html