How would getting the vaccine cause them to be ostracized from their social groups? I have 3 friends whom I drove to get their Covid vaccines. They knew I wasn't getting one; it made no difference to them. I also have 2 other friends who chose not to get the vaccine; the husband has health issues & (after a flu shot almost killed him) his doctor said, "No Covid or flu shots for you." His wife can get the vaccine; she chose not to. Also makes no difference to me.People are against the covid vaccine and wearing facemasks because they don't want to be ostracized from their social groups, and they fear that's what would happen if they didn't go with the flow.
That makes 2 of us.I NEVER believe anything on CNN.
There is something in the woodpile. The scientist never got to who & how it got to the USA. No one punishing China for letting this get out of their lab. In a nutshell, this is germ warfare they were developing. They should have never been able to develop under the Geneva convention rules.
That's exactly right. It's also the primary reason for vaccine reluctance. That, and the description of the mRna (in the vaccine) as an enzyme that converts a gene. Something that "alters your genes" is scary. And it sounds permanent.Insofar as the "speed" with which these vaccines were developed, and made available...that is probably a Good Thing, IMO. Had the drug companies taken years to make these vaccines, and get full government approval, the current death toll would probably be several times greater than today....both here, and globally....and the daily death toll would be rising beyond what our hospitals and funeral parlors could keep up with.
We need to remember, though....this vaccine was already in the works for at least a decade, in response to SARS.I, too, am highly skeptical about how and where this virus originated. Given the lack of cooperation from the Chinese government, I doubt we will ever know the truth.
Insofar as the "speed" with which these vaccines were developed, and made available...that is probably a Good Thing, IMO. Had the drug companies taken years to make these vaccines, and get full government approval, the current death toll would probably be several times greater than today....both here, and globally....and the daily death toll would be rising beyond what our hospitals and funeral parlors could keep up with.
I agree!When big pharma & medicine 'experts' talk, give interviews etc onething that's rarely mentioned is that those vaxxed were not tested for antibodies from a prior asymptomatic infection. Or noted they had a full blown symptomatic infection prior to the jab/s.
How do they know wether the vax or natural immunity is preventing the virus in the vaxxed? Sounds like an important variable that's not included in many statistics/studies even with a footnote.
I see the schedule young people on from infancy through teens for vaxxes and it's outlandish. Maybe one vax won't adversely affect a person but dozens might. Same for adults especially with other conditions, medications and general health. Vaxxes or the disease are an attack on the body, the body just like a country can only fight so many wars.I agree!
It's still being argued that 20-30 years ago doctors started over-prescribing antibiotics, ruining kids' immune systems. I never filled those Rx's for my kids. If they'd ever gotten sick enough to need antibiotics, I took them to the hospital. My youngest son got an infection in his knee when he was 5....inside, in the joint. Spent 4 days in hospital. But otherwise, for colds and stuff, they rested at home, got fluids and ate gramma's chicken soup, and were outside playing in a day or two.
That's exactly right. It's also the primary reason for vaccine reluctance. That, and the description of the mRna (in the vaccine) as an enzyme that converts a gene. Something that "alters your genes" is scary. And it sounds permanent.
What makes you think that?I feel there will be huge problems with the after affects of the vaccines in years to come