Molecular Biologist Speaks about Vaccine

Conformation bias is a real thing, as evidenced by otherwise rational people who are gullible enough to believe the woman in the OP's video, but yet dismiss anything said by 99% of the scientific community.
 

chic said:
She was interesting. It's refreshing to hear a molecular biologist saying the unvaccinated are not the cause of the variants. The vaccinated are. This was my thought after seeing what's been happening in Israel and in my own home state of the U.S.

View attachment 185018
Click to expand...
Which is why they probably should've let the virus cycle through the year like the annual flu unless an extreme outbreak. All the lockdowns etc put people in contact with others they would've normally have little to no contact in places like NYC for example more people spending time in apt building or limited schedule public transportation helped some spread. This would've saved ppe especially in the early stages and the most vunerable could've been given that ppe, testing and then a vax if warranted.

Also without the national/microscopic focus more doctors might have tried different treatments/therapeutics. I know several who had a stubborn unidentified flu in late 2019/ early 2020 and the docs tried different things which got them through without hospitalization. Should note average age about 67.

Yes people would've gotten sick and some die just like the flu but we seem to get through flu cycles without ppe, lockdowns, blanket testing and low efficacy vaxxes.
 
Last edited:
WhatInThe said:
they probably should've let the virus cycle through the year like the annual flu unless an extreme outbreak...

Yes people would've gotten sick and some die just like the flu
Click to expand...
I think that is a very good point, and one that should have been more openly discussed and debated. In the end it may be what a lot of the anti-mask/vaccine/shutdowns/etc are thinking. I think it would have made for a more rational debate than much of what went on.
 
Alligatorob said:
On linkedin she calls herself an "Alternative Health Practitioner, Psychic, Clinical Herbalist, Biofeedback Therapist", but not a molecular biologist. see https://ca.linkedin.com/in/gina-goad-b7481277

She does have a BS degree in biology from Queen's University, a good school.
Click to expand...
I would rather listen to a scientist from a very good school, who has a Ph.D. A bachelor's degree is just the first step.
 
Alligatorob said:
I think that is a very good point, and one that should have been more openly discussed and debated. In the end it may be what a lot of the anti-mask/vaccine/shutdowns/etc are thinking. I think it would have made for a more rational debate than much of what went on.
Click to expand...
As long as you don't have a problem with a million or more additional American death, then by all means go for it. And make sure you and your families and friends are at the front of the line to be exposed to the virus. Best wishes
 
suds00 said:
anyone can print their opinion in large script.. medical experts have said the vaccine is safe and effective. why didn't the dawson creek city council have a medical doctor speak instead of a biologist?
Click to expand...
I was going to link to an article in CBC news today too. Veritas already did it. It’s worth reading.

Council decided to let some of them make short presentations ahead of the regular meeting. Bumstead said it was not an effort to endorse their ideas, but to allow them to be heard as members of the community he was elected to represent.
Click to expand...
They won’t be doing that again.
 
Whomever she is, she--like Congressman Jim Jordan and many others who wish to obfuscate truth--use an age-old literature/debating technique called "fogging". This is where you drop a lot of technical words, or simply your ideas that you wish to mess people's heads with, driving them quickly and furiously into your audience, in hopes that they will not notice all the untruths that you use to fool people. You spin out such word confetti that unsuspecting do not know what's hitting them. Human nature wants affirmation, so people pick up a few words/ideas that they like and hold dear because they want our hard-wired "truths" to be affirmed. Very intelligent people fall for this. You should not and don't have to. Look up ''literary techniques' and read what the professional obfuscaters, such as the late Rush Limbaugh, most of the Fox "news" cast, and many others, know and employ very well. Learn the techniques used on you and you will not be so gosh-darned confused. Listen carefully again to what dear Gina says and you will hear blatant lies interspersed throughout. Peace.
 
EllieDay said:
Whomever she is, she--like Congressman Jim Jordan and many others who wish to obfuscate truth--use an age-old literature/debating technique called "fogging". This is where you drop a lot of technical words, or simply your ideas that you wish to mess people's heads with, driving them quickly and furiously into your audience, in hopes that they will not notice all the untruths that you use to fool people. You spin out such word confetti that unsuspecting do not know what's hitting them. Human nature wants affirmation, so people pick up a few words/ideas that they like and hold dear because they want our hard-wired "truths" to be affirmed. Very intelligent people fall for this. You should not and don't have to. Look up ''literary techniques' and read what the professional obfuscaters, such as the late Rush Limbaugh, most of the Fox "news" cast, and many others, know and employ very well. Learn the techniques used on you and you will not be so gosh-darned confused. Listen carefully again to what dear Gina says and you will hear blatant lies interspersed throughout. Peace.
Click to expand...
I know your new here, please don't be offended when I say that your opinion of above subject is just that, your opinion. We're all being fed a lot of "fogging", even by the "experts".
 
Becky1951 said:
I know your new here, please don't be offended when I say that your opinion of above subject is just that, your opinion. We're all being fed a lot of "fogging", even by the "experts".
Click to expand...

There have been eight so far whose only post has been once on this thread.
They all have the same attitude so it's likely one person who's been making up the fake nicknames.
 
John cycling said:
There have been eight so far whose only post has been once on this thread.
They all have the same attitude so it's likely one person who's been making up the fake nicknames.
Click to expand...
I think your right. I just looked and they joined, made one post on this thread only, no other threads and nothing since.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top