Liza1948
New Member
Let me ask you a question. Do you often stand in a field, shaking your fist and yelling at clouds in your pajamas? Or, perhaps a better question, have you considered that your points of view would benefit from cogent arguments or ability to understand basic financial theory rather than inventing numbers and declaring yourself correct at the end of your clam-handed approach to challenges of your views.Not a genius, but it seems I have a much better grasp then you do as to what many retirees want or use …
sure you got some retirees that still are swinging for the fences or want high equity .
but most retirees are in the 35-60% range and use balanced portfolios or balanced funds.
wellesly is one of the most popular funds with retirees ….but it lacks high inflation protection or protection from increasing negative real returns on cash instruments which is where gold tends to shine when other assets drop the ball
I already proved gold did a better job than bonds when mated to equities .
thanks for playing
Here's a hot news flash: no one has heard of the Wellesley approach. We also didn't go to the Trump Real Estate College and most people don't think retirement should be based on non-sensical, reality detached approaches to financial management.
You might benefit from trying to understand behaviorial biases in finance and economics, cognitave dissonance and ex-post evaluation biases in portfolio management.