Should it be Citizenship then origin

African Americans and Native Americans aside, people born in the US almost never use heritage descriptors like Irish-American or Italian-American.

That said, many of us have pride and enjoy our ancestral roots. For instance, my father's family came from Italy. Italian foods and holiday traditions were a treasured part of my childhood and adulthood, which have been passed down to my children and now my grands.

When the subject of heritage comes up in the US, it's generally understood that pre-American roots are being discussed.

When traveling outside the US and asked where I'm from I usually say California or Los Angeles (by my accent most have already deduced I'm American). It's clear to me the inquirer is wondering where I live, not the song-and-dance of where my ancestors were born.

My newest grandson's heritage is 1/2 Korean, 1/8 Italian, 1/8 German and a whole bunch of other bits. Given that my son and his wife embrace her family's Korean traditions and his family's Italian traditions, when their children grow up they'll probably most strongly claim Korean and Italian heritage. That's despite their children being the second generation on the Korean side to be born in the US, and fourth generation on the Italian side.

My friend's ancestors arrived in the US before the Revolutionary war in 1776. She nevertheless holds dear her English and Scottish roots and some of those traditions.

Truth is, the US is more a mosaic than a melting pot.
Americans make themselves different.. by hyphenating their name... it causes trouble between races ... you have Irish Americans fighting with Italian Americans, and African Americans crying foul, ''we're not treated the same as Jewish Americans because of our colour/race/creed''...and so forth... if they all called themselves simply Americans there might be a lot less problems
This part I bolded was true during waves of European immigration pre-WWII, but died out long ago.

I regret to say that Blacks and Jews have in fact been subjected to unfair treatment, hatred and bigotry in this country and many others, European countries included. Many of their complaints are valid and justified.

For the record, I've had dozens of Jewish friends over the years and never heard any of them - or their parents - refer to themselves as Jewish Americans. They'll say they're Jewish, which identifies their religion and culture. (The American part is obvious.)
 

Last edited:
As an American, I believe that it should be citizenship first then Origin of birth. Such as American Mexican, American African, American Brit and so on. It is used for American Indians, so why the change when other peoples that come from other parts of the planet and pledge citizenship here in America? It seems a little un-unifying.
I wouldn't say it's "un-unifying". It's simply a way to define a person's full or partial ancestry. I'm Italian American, but as @StarSong said, I don't usually describe myself as such. People are proud of their heritage, and I think it's fine if they choose to describe themselves that way. It doesn't show any disrespect or make them any less American to do so. 🇺🇸

‘Native American’ or ‘American Indian’? How to Talk About Indigenous People of America >> https://www.healthline.com/health/native-american-vs-american-indian

Bella ✌️
 

I wouldn't say it's "un-unifying". It's simply a way to define a person's full or partial ancestry. I'm Italian American, but as @StarSong said, I don't usually describe myself as such. People are proud of their heritage, and I think it's fine if they choose to describe themselves that way. It doesn't show any disrespect or make them any less American to do so. 🇺🇸

‘Native American’ or ‘American Indian’? How to Talk About Indigenous People of America >> https://www.healthline.com/health/native-american-vs-american-indian

Bella ✌️
I’m more proud of being American 🇺🇸. I know my ancestry and am always grateful that at one point in time they immigrated here and help make this country great in their small way.
 
Rob. Seriously ? Canada does not want to be " American " in any way. Please respect that desire to be ourselves, not " America light ". JimB.
You are North Americans, Canada lies in North America.

Doesn't mean that you want to be like us to the south, or are. Just a geographic fact.

I did not mean to suggest you add the United to your name, just pointing out that you could if you wanted to.
 
And of course we don't want to do any such thing. Drop it, please. JimB.
Nor should you. Canada is a lovely country with its own unique identity. The US is blessed to share a border with such a good neighbor.

Just as people who live on all other continents identify themselves by their individual countries (a friend refers to herself as Chilean, not South American and a friend from Spain refers to herself as Spanish, though she's well aware that she's also European), why would people who live on the continent of North America use the imprecise term "North American" when there are far better descriptors available?

Despite all living in North America, Canadians are Canadian, US residents are American, Mexicans are Mexican. Nothing confusing about that - and no fixes needed.
 
Nor should you. Canada is a lovely country with its own unique identity. The US is blessed to share a border with such a good neighbor.

Just as people who live on all other continents identify themselves by their individual countries (a friend refers to herself as Chilean, not South American and a friend from Spain refers to herself as Spanish, though she's well aware that she's also European), why would people who live on the continent of North America use the imprecise term "North American" when there are far better descriptors available?

Despite all living in North America, Canadians are Canadian, US residents are American, Mexicans are Mexican. Nothing confusing about that - and no fixes needed.
yes but Spain is a country in it's own right.. it's not in the country of Europe....
 
Last edited:
An interesting article on our name: Why the U.S. Has No Name . To quote:

"Even the U.S.’s name, or lack thereof, suggests a problem of identity. Founders of new countries generally give them unique names, like Bolivia (named after Simon Bolívar), Pakistan (based on an acronym), and South Africa. But the U.S. Founding Fathers made no attempt to give their new … thing its own name (like Washingtonia, Trans-Atlanta, Avalon, or even Great America). “United States of America” named a political organization, not a country. America, after all, referred to two whole continents, not the much smaller land the new Union occupied."
 
An interesting article on our name: Why the U.S. Has No Name . To quote:

"Even the U.S.’s name, or lack thereof, suggests a problem of identity. Founders of new countries generally give them unique names, like Bolivia (named after Simon Bolívar), Pakistan (based on an acronym), and South Africa. But the U.S. Founding Fathers made no attempt to give their new … thing its own name (like Washingtonia, Trans-Atlanta, Avalon, or even Great America). “United States of America” named a political organization, not a country. America, after all, referred to two whole continents, not the much smaller land the new Union occupied."
America is named for Amerigo Vespucci who landed here before Columbus did.
 
America is named for Amerigo Vespucci who landed here before Columbus did.
Yes that is the origin of the name.

However I am not sure he got here before Columbus, but he wrote about his experiences here and his writings were widely read. The first widely read writings about the Western Hemisphere. So people just associated his name with it all.

He wrote about both North and South America, and both got his name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerigo_Vespucci
 
As an American, I believe that it should be citizenship first then Origin of birth. Such as American Mexican, American African, American Brit and so on. It is used for American Indians, so why the change when other peoples that come from other parts of the planet and pledge citizenship here in America? It seems a little un-unifying.
I never really got my head around this Origin of birth thing. Actually, I find it to be slightly racist, to be honest.
Labeling always comes with some amount of hate or discord.
Over here you have first Australian and the rest are just Aussies
 
The bottom line to all the derision about this, that and the other guarantees that the powers that be maintain absolute control via laws, rules, policies and the economy as long the masses divide themselves by fomenting individuality that the powers that be insert into the human mindset. North America, Central America, South America. What about Canada? Obviously a significant part of the Western Hemisphere and obviously the largest Country in land mass in North America.

A. Am I a Canadian or am I Nova Scotian, British Columbian, Labradorian?

C. Am I a Central American or am I Honduran, Panamanian, Honduran?

D. Am I a South American or am I Columbian, Costa Rican, El Salvadorian?

E. Am I an African or am I Somali, Kenyan, Nigerian, Israeli, Iranian, Syrian?

F. Am I African American, Russian Jew, Hispanic-Latino-Chicano, Asian, Oriental?

G. Am I Biracial? Half White/Caucasian and Half Black? Half Latino and Half Jewish?

H. Am I Multiracial or Multicultural? Half White, one quarter Latino and one Quarter Black?

And on and on. What race am I? The Human race.

www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html

Thanks for reading.
 


Back
Top