Georgiagranny
Well-known Member
I. Beg. Your. Pardon?Apparently, they wanted to beat up fags, and N's.
I. Beg. Your. Pardon?Apparently, they wanted to beat up fags, and N's.
Yes. Prosecutor will have to prove conspiracy to riot, and I only skimmed the article, but I didn't see anything about a manifesto or anything like that regarding this specific event.This will be an interesting legal case to follow.
I'm glad that the alleged plan was foiled before anyone was injured.
Based solely on the information in the video, it sounds like the authorities may have a weak criminal case even though they saved the day.
This is such an archaic term, I haven't spoken it since I was 12. I have re-attributed this term to refer to the type of immature, socially under-developed individual who has such a fragile ego, that he seeks to denigrate others to make himself feel more...macho. AKA, a bully, those are the true fags. You can include the various active shooters, the wannabes, plus anyone that thinks they need an AR style rifle to protect their frightened happy a**."Fag is mainly used as an offensive term for homosexuals. Although it has other meanings, you should probably avoid it at all costs.
White supremist are not just racist, they are anti any alternate lifestyle except heterosexual.so they were just going to break up a parade because a few black people irritated them for being black.. ?.. jeez how old are these people?
I hope so, Frank. That's why I said, "I don't think you meant to be offensive...but...". Then I edited my post to add ...Bella, I'm absolutely certain Fuzzy was intentionally offensive out of disgust for the White Supremacists.
Still, regardless, even in that context, those terms in and of themselves are derogatory and disgusting. White supremacists speak very well for themselves and don't need our help. I just had to speak up.Hopefully, you're just using terms the white supremacists use.
Bella![]()
Yep they hate anyone who is different from them.huh?..I'm even more confused.... white supremacists are also anti-gays?..sometimes I think I live in a parallel universe
I don't have a problem if they were arrested and are given their day in court. They were arrested based on the fact they were loading up into a van in a parking lot which contained shields and shin guards. I do have a problem when other groups have railroad spikes, frozen water bottles, molotov cocktails, firearms; having already set buildings auto, etc on fire, and are characterized as mostly peaceful protestors. Is it too much to ask for equal enforcement of the law regardless of the name or philosophy of the group involved?Do they arrest Antifa in riot gear who actually are caught in the act? No, of course not, but the police assume that these people were aiming to cause a riot and do damage. This will not fly in a court of law. For all those cops know, they were planning to march peacefully. My point here is; simply because they were in a truck dressed in what was termed as riot gear, they were arrested while others who really do the damage get away with God knows what. Something wrong here.
The white gangs in prison control the methamphetamine trade. An inmate is under intense pressure to "affiliate" with his/ hers respective racial gang. If they are caught 'mingling' with other races, there will be consequences.Prison gangs, vis-à-vis other White supremacist types, appear to have an additional motives—such as gaining profit from illicit activities and finding personal protection from rival racial and ethnic prison gangs—which in many cases is greater than a purported ideological commitment to White racial supremacy.
As I always say: "If you want to find the worst hypocrisy & the worst sin, find a religious figure."And yet there was a member just last week challenging the fact that gay people had reached "equality" and should just shut up. Look at these comments from a pastor in Fort Worth. If I'm vocal on this forum, this is why. This is a long fight.
https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/northeast-tarrant/article262327032.html