Been There
Well-known Member
- Location
- Florida
What I have experienced is that the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs, along with any other consultants they feel should be included, would meet and after discussion, they would come to a recommendation that would then go to the President. He would then sign off on the order to do whatever action was decided upon. The Secretary of Defense has a lot of input in this type of issue and also has the power to sign that type of order in certain situations.Not sure I agree with that. As commander in chief, a head of state (president) is the supreme command of a country's armed forces, I would say if the president gives the orders, the officers better follow through.
If you remember, during 9-11 Rumsfeld had the power to order a shoot-down of any planes, including our domestic planes, if he felt the plane or planes were threatening to hundreds of lives. There is always (I use the word “always” with hesitancy) a backup plan if the President is out of position. On the day when 9-11 happened, Rumsfeld happened to be in his office in the Pentagon. If Rumsfeld were to sign off on an order, he would most likely do so with the President’s authorization.
Speaking of 9-11, that was a very scary time for many Americans. We really had no emergency plan in place for what happened that day. I don’t know if the powers to be never gave it a thought that the towers would come under attack or what. The Office of Emergency Management was built next door to the towers. This proved to be a huge mistake because communications had been knocked out in that area when the towers were attacked. Not everyone, fire departments, police, the Port Authority were receiving the same information and instructions, which caused a lot of confusion. Since then, the OEM has been moved.