The issue here is that people are unique individuals, and they typically bring a package of good and bad traits. So it's difficult to know right away their strengths and weaknesses, and these come out over time. Given that, we often get sucked into relationships because of a strong trait or appearance we like (attractive face, nice voice, height, etc). Over time, these other "bad" traits that could be a deal breaker may not feel so bad because the strong traits may overpower the weak or bad traits. Does that make sense? So we need to be truthful to ourselves as to how much of a dealbreaker these things are. Can we live with them even though we thought we didn't like that trait? So it's not as straightforward as we originally think.
It's so true that it takes time for the "best foot forward" phase to dissipate before you can really get to know someone. If they're trying to maintain a facade, sooner or later, that's going to crack, and you're going to see what's beneath it.
I agree that there are some mild initial deal-breakers I
might be able to live with. Depending on what they are and weighed against the good qualities of the person, it's possible that some things can be tolerated. For me, there are absolute deal-breakers, no matter how seemingly kind, good-looking, etc., a potential companion or partner might be.
1: Anger issues, I don't like angry men. If he doesn't have control over himself at this point in life, it ain't gonna happen.
2: Dishonesty, lying, subterfuge, and infidelity. That's a one-way ticket on the Adios Express...
3: Domineering, controlling, manipulative. You are not my boss. See above.
4: Bad hygiene. Fuggedaboutit. Just no. Ick.
5: Doesn't like animals. Nope.
6: We're not on the same page politically. No, I can't do it.
So, it looks like I'll be spending my old age alone, lol.
Bella
