HP sparks fury after disabling printers if customers use ink from cheaper suppliers

hollydolly

SF VIP
Location
London England
Hewlett-Packard, or HP, have disabled the printers of customers who used ink cartridges from cheaper rival companies.

This sparked an outrage after they issued a 'firmware' update blocking customers from using cheaper, non-HP ink cartridges in their printers.

HP printers will now not work unless they are fitted with the approved ink cartridges after they were remotely updated.

If the cartridges are not fitted with a HP microchip, which are typically more expensive, the machine will refuse to print any documents.

HP ink cartridges can cost more than double the price of third-party offerings.

The printer company told the Telegraph it issued the update to reduce the risk of malware attacks, saying 'third-party cartridges that use non-HP chips or circuitry can pose risks to the hardware performance, print quality, and security.'

According to their website, the printer company also blocked the use of other ink cartridges in order to 'maintain the integrity of our printing systems, and protect our intellectual property'.

Before the update, HP printers would issue an alter to customers when they didn't use HP branded ink but now the machines will not work at all if they are used.

Many angry customers took to social media complaining about the update claiming they felt 'cheated' by the update.

Signing up for a HP ink subscription can set customers back by £4.49 a month to print 100 pages.

This subscription ranges from 99p for 10 pages per month to £22.40 for 700 pages.

It's unclear which printer models are or will be affected by this change in the future.

This is not the first time HP has outraged its customers by blocking the use of other ink cartridges.

The firm has been forced to pay out millions in compensation to customers in America, Australia and across Europe since it first introduced dynamic security measures back in 2016.
 

I'll never consider HP again when in the market for any computer or accessory. Now if they want to take that stick out of their butt, I may consider thinking about dealing with them years down the road, but I'll never forget how underhanded they are willing to be. I did buy a laptop from them once. It wasn't a special laptop and I had too many problems with it. I stopped using it, even though it still worked. I can't even remember the password to open it. It's seldom that I put out that much money to be so disappointed. But this ink thing is absurd, the cost of ink is absurd to begin with. They are taking advantage of what for the consumer is nothing more than a design flaw in modern printers and pushing it beyond reason.
 
My first printer scanner was a Great big HP.. and it was fine, it lasted for quite a few years.. I've had various printers since then.. mainly cannon, but including Kodak ..and of course I have to use generic ink, because who can afford the brand name now ?..we'd be cheaper off buying a whole new Printer which comes already filled with ink.

Hp has for a while now been getting a very poor reputation starting with having to sign up for monthly supplies of ink when buying a new printer.... so I'd be surprised if this latest move won't be the final nail in their coffin..
 
I do not print much, just coupons mostly, recipes sometimes. But I do use HP for ink as I find it is not that much more expensive at Walmart than the generic brand. Copies are crisp and clear, no complaints.
 
I have a cheap Cannon, the cheapest I could find. I seldom use a printer, maybe a total of 20 pages a year, and most of those are just test runs. The printer does a good job, but it doesn't double as a fax machine, or copier. The disqualifying flaw is the cost of ink. If I printed a lot, I would look into a laser printer.
 
My last HP printer is sitting here now. It's an ink hog and the worst thing is if you don't use it often the expensive ink dries up. I've been thinking a cheaper laser printer would be better for me. Some are priced at around $100 now.

Does anyone here have a laser printer for home use they would recommend?

https://www.popularmechanics.com/te...JCu79r9LauLKJshbIMdrazsomW871pXRoCOgoQAvD_BwE
WE can buy a printer here in the UK with ink for as little as £35 in some places...
 
I bought today two Canon ink cartridges Black&Colour: for $87.00.The printer I paid $60.00 for when new!!
I think my Cannon cost $39, but I buy 3rd party ink cartridges. I don't bother with color. I just buy black and set the printer to 'grey scale." But I leave an empty color cartridge in it, so I can fool the printer, although I don't know if that's actually necessary.
that's almost criminal...
It's nuts.
 
I think my Cannon cost $39, but I buy 3rd party ink cartridges. I don't bother with color. I just buy black and set the printer to 'grey scale." But I leave an empty color cartridge in it, so I can fool the printer, although I don't know if that's actually necessary.

It's nuts.
No not necessary, in settings/maintenance can choose black ink only.
 
No not necessary, in settings/maintenance can choose black ink only.
OK, now I'm going to turn on my printer (first time since I did my taxes in January) and look for that. I'm thinking my printer doesn't offer that. Although Grey Scale seems to do the job just fine.

la dee da dee da.....

Well, I'll be gotohell. There it is. But it's settings/maintenance/ink cartridge settings/. Our paths have crossed before. You seem to be the guy to talk to when searching for obscure deeply buried options in software.
 
after struggling with an Epson Inkjet, I bought a Brother Laser printer and am very happy with it. I rarely need color for anything, and if I do I just go to CVS to print it.
 
after struggling with an Epson Inkjet, I bought a Brother Laser printer and am very happy with it. I rarely need color for anything, and if I do I just go to CVS to print it.
I bought a Brother printer, too. It won't stay connected to the WiFi, but other than that, it works good.

I don't care for HP products, although I am using an HP monitor, so it depends on the product.
 
Am I missing something. My needs for a printer are mostly non-extant. Even the courts accept electronic copies now, the IRS has been accepting them for a few years. If I need to keep something it gets saved as a .pdf file & stored either online, the cloud or to a flash drive. I'm not into photography or keeping pictures of my grandchildren anymore, don't need the memories. If I do need a paper copy of something I go to my local CVS or library. Printer ink is too darn expensive & totally unnecessary for my needs anymore. But that's just me.

I do have a disposable unused printer in my closet taking up room.

Went to an auto body shop for an estimate, the estimator came out & took several pictures. then told me after telling me the final figure that they would email me a complete breakdown with pictures. Beat me home now I have an electronic copy of the damages & pictures including their estimate stored on my hard drive. Nice!
 
Last edited:
When I want to use a recipe, I just bring my device to the kitchen and use it there.
When I did that the other day, I misread the quantity of adobo spice. Used triple the amount. I’ll probably keep printing and tossing it afterwards. I don’t uses recipes that often.
 
Just asked DH. He said that the coloured are less costly than black. Since they don’t say the amount of ink, just the number of pages it should print, it probably isn’t any savings buying the colour. I’m too lazy to investigate the bottom line.
 


Back
Top