Rose65
Well-known Member
- Location
- United Kingdom
They have done very well, won the respect of everyone including men.
So, my rambling thoughts. To me they just look and act exactly like men, including the way the managers, referee and commentators act. Little girls as mascots. The details are all replicating exactly how usual men's games look and are. No female behaviour.
Which makes me wonder if in fact that is vital, necessary, even unavoidable - to be masculine in a traditionally male sport. Or is it purely about the beauty of the game, the sport itself being paramount?
Is 'homogeneous' the right word for the way things are going overall these days? All blended into one, feminine and masculine no longer being relevant terms?
I have mixed feelings about this, what does anyone else think?
So, my rambling thoughts. To me they just look and act exactly like men, including the way the managers, referee and commentators act. Little girls as mascots. The details are all replicating exactly how usual men's games look and are. No female behaviour.
Which makes me wonder if in fact that is vital, necessary, even unavoidable - to be masculine in a traditionally male sport. Or is it purely about the beauty of the game, the sport itself being paramount?
Is 'homogeneous' the right word for the way things are going overall these days? All blended into one, feminine and masculine no longer being relevant terms?
I have mixed feelings about this, what does anyone else think?
Last edited: