Paco Dennis
SF VIP
- Location
- Mid-Missouri
I have no idea.
Isn't there a saying in Zen Buddhism that includes "First there is a mountain, then there is no mountain, then there is."?
“Before I had studied Chan / Zen for thirty years, I saw mountains as mountains and rivers as rivers when I arrived at a more intimate knowledge, I came to the point where I saw that mountains are not mountains, and rivers are not rivers. But now that I have got its very substance I am at rest. For it’s just that I see mountains once again as mountains and rivers once again as rivers.”
Brings me back......
I have no idea.
Isn't there a saying in Zen Buddhism that includes "First there is a mountain, then there is no mountain, then there is."?
Thank you, O BuddessSorry forgot to post the rest...
Upon meditative reflection we come to realise that the idea of the mountain as being a solid fixed object in our experience is a limited and false misconception.
We begin to see more clearly that it is something arising moment by moment in time, dependent on many conditions. It is alive, vibrant, constantly changing and moving. It is not a static, solid fixed object.
In the final stage, with a deepening insight, we no longer perceive the mountain as a solid thing but as a flowing process and we then use language to describe the idea or concept of what a mountain is, but from a new awareness where we hold any concepts of things in the world very lightly.
That's what goes thru my mind when I trip over nothingWas the mountain really there, or???? nothing is as it seems
Or, more precisely, padded bras?Well, I can remember the "guys" being convinced it was about b00bs.....Juanita's in particular....
Sorry forgot to post the rest...
Upon meditative reflection we come to realise that the idea of the mountain as being a solid fixed object in our experience is a limited and false misconception.
We begin to see more clearly that it is something arising moment by moment in time, dependent on many conditions. It is alive, vibrant, constantly changing and moving. It is not a static, solid fixed object.
In the final stage, with a deepening insight, we no longer perceive the mountain as a solid thing but as a flowing process and we then use language to describe the idea or concept of what a mountain is, but from a new awareness where we hold any concepts of things in the world very lightly.
? I can understand the everchanging metaphor with the butterfly. Everchanging and temporary also. I remember now the Buddhist saying. I fool myself into hanging onto certain things and thoughts/emotions like they are more "solid" than they are.If I had to touch a snail to open a garden gate, I'd be incline to move on to another garden.The line "The lock upon my garden gate's a snail, that's what it is". Still baffles me.? Maybe View attachment 299713 ? I can understand the everchanging metaphor with the butterfly. Everchanging and temporary also. I remember now the Buddhist saying. I fool myself into hanging onto certain things and thoughts/emotions like they are more "solid" than they are.
Yea, remembering that song brings back my late teen years. I never heard the B00bie theory.![]()
![]()

I bet he made more money as a songwriter than a singer. But he IS as popular as he ever was in the US because he was never all that popular. Kind of a niche performer.https://www.ratherrarerecords.com/donovan-zen-mountains/
It says in the above article that Donovan's records are not collectible..his music is not in Demand... I can understand that... he was of his time, and his time was the 60's.... he plays still to this day..live concerts usually small ... but Donovan believes to this day he's as popular as he ever was, and who can take that away from him..?... he's a genuinely , nice guy... altho' his Brain might be a little addled after all the junk he took alongside the Beatles in the 60's...
lol..he was very popular in the UK in the 60's.. and into the 70's.. but like the USA he's a niche singer now...and only us oldies have heard of him...I bet he made more money as a songwriter than a singer. But he IS as popular as he ever was in the US because he was never all that popular. Kind of a niche performer.
He was always popular with me!!I bet he made more money as a songwriter than a singer. But he IS as popular as he ever was in the US because he was never all that popular. Kind of a niche performer.
Wait. He did other kinds of music?I even liked his crappy folk music!
Yes. I have his folk albums.Wait. He did other kinds of music?
No..he didn't....Wait. He did other kinds of music?