Paul McCartney just when you think someone had aged well

hollydolly

hollydolly

SF VIP
Location
London England
...and without surgery....

You realise he's had facial intervention.... .. shame...

This is Paul a few weeks ago...in June 2023 ..looking much younger than his age


this is him 6 years ago...looking his age...

 

Mizmo said:
Oh yes, lookin very fresh.... good for him! :D
Click to expand...
I have never for one minute found him attractive, He's got a little ball face. and a tiny mouth... very odd looking...
Paul%20McCartney%20Spitting%20image%20Restoration%2011.jpg
...he was the least attractive of the Beatles IMO...

When I was young.. Ringo Starr was looked on as the ugliest of the group by the majority... I never thought he was.. not hugely attractive but more so IMO than Paul.. and John...and in fact if you look at the history of the women in all their lives he had the most attractive wives.. but of course..like so many , to me George was by far the best looking.. and the nicest of them all
 
I agree with you @holly did not find he that cute.
why at his age would he bother to get work .. I think at a certain point it just gives some people a cartoon look.
 
Jeni said:
I agree with you @holly did not find he that cute.
why at his age would he bother to get work .. I think at a certain point it just gives some people a cartoon look.
Click to expand...
I absolutely agree.. however in Maccas..case..in this instance it's actually done him some favours, and taken him from the puppet face look, to less so... but at 80.. why bother, it's not like he's trying to catch himself a woman, or get a job meant for a younger person... but hey.. whatever floats his boat.. I just think it's quite amusing these people think nowadays with access to everything on the internet , that we wouldn't notice
 
hollydolly said:
I have never for one minute found him attractive, He's got a little ball face. and a tiny mouth... very odd looking...
Paul%20McCartney%20Spitting%20image%20Restoration%2011.jpg
...he was the least attractive of the Beatles IMO...

When I was young.. Ringo Starr was looked on as the ugliest of the group by the majority... I never thought he was.. not hugely attractive but more so IMO than Paul.. and John...and in fact if you look at the history of the women in all their lives he had the most attractive wives.. but of course..like so many , to me George was by far the best looking.. and the nicest of them all
Click to expand...

Oh I did not think he was ever cute.
In fact, I did not fancy any of them but the thing is, if it makes him feel good at his age then good on him.
Some of the show people go overboard and just end up looking ridiculous.
 
OneEyedDiva said:
I didn't say he's cute now. 🤣 Well, who did you think was the cutest?
Click to expand...
Oh George, without a doubt... I have to say I was never into the Beatles, they were my mothers era...but as I got older, I could see that George was the better looking of them all, IMO..I never could see what people saw in Paul or even John for that matter :unsure:
 
Last edited:
One should not criticise others unless one is perfect themselves…and… no one is perfect!!



This is Paul as he looks today, right this minute… at 81 he looks better than many 70 year olds or younger…not only that… he is full of vitality and still churning out good music !!

There is absolutely no proof he has had plastic surgery…and… even if he had botox it is certainly no one’s business… he is still the cutest Beatle!! Love you Paul!

I might add many people use botox to help with migraine headaches and depression. Paul suffers from both.
 
hollydolly said:
Oh George, without a doubt... I have to say I was never into the Beatles, they were my mothers era...but as I got older, I could see that George was the better looking of them all, IMO..I never could see what people saw in Paul or even John for that matter :unsure:
Click to expand...
Well, now I have to ask you...did you always have trouble with your vision? :LOL::ROFLMAO: To me George was "meh", just ordinary looking IMO. I asked my BFF tonight who she thought was the cutest. She said Paul too. Without coaching, she said made the same type of statement about George. And I guess there were masses of women, who according to you, must've had eye problems, because it was generally felt that Paul was the best looking. Here's the "summarizer" from Reddit:
"According to various sources, there is no clear consensus on who was the best-looking Beatle. Some sources suggest that Stu Sutcliffe, a former Beatle, was probably the best-looking Beatle, as he looked like a supermodel and gave the Beatles their "cool" look with sunglasses and leather jackets.2 Others believe that Paul McCartney was the most attractive, at least when he was younger, and that John Lennon was the most attractive.

George Harrison is also considered the coolest Beatle, as he seemed to have just about the right balance of enthusiasm and cynicism, recognized his own flaws, and appeared to have emerged from the wreckage of the Biggest Band Of All Time happier and more balanced than anyone else who was involved with it. However, there is a gender gap: men favored John, while women preferred Paul." :love:
 
hollydolly said:
I absolutely agree.. however in Maccas..case..in this instance it's actually done him some favours, and taken him from the puppet face look, to less so... but at 80.. why bother, it's not like he's trying to catch himself a woman, or get a job meant for a younger person... but hey.. whatever floats his boat.. I just think it's quite amusing these people think nowadays with access to everything on the internet , that we wouldn't notice
Click to expand...
I think performers feel the need to look young because their audience wants to see them as they remember them. We saw Depeche Mode last night and Dave Gahan still looks fit and great for 61 and can still do his spins. I don't think he's had any work done but his onstage persona was the same as in the 80's.


Re: Paul McCartney's "enhancement", I think he looks fine. Sir Cliff Richard, not so much.

 
Last edited:
OneEyedDiva said:
Well, now I have to ask you...did you always have trouble with your vision? :LOL::ROFLMAO: To me George was "meh", just ordinary looking IMO. I asked my BFF tonight who she thought was the cutest. She said Paul too. Without coaching, she said made the same type of statement about George. And I guess there were masses of women, who according to you, must've had eye problems, because it was generally felt that Paul was the best looking. Here's the "summarizer" from Reddit:
"According to various sources, there is no clear consensus on who was the best-looking Beatle. Some sources suggest that Stu Sutcliffe, a former Beatle, was probably the best-looking Beatle, as he looked like a supermodel and gave the Beatles their "cool" look with sunglasses and leather jackets.2 Others believe that Paul McCartney was the most attractive, at least when he was younger, and that John Lennon was the most attractive.

George Harrison is also considered the coolest Beatle, as he seemed to have just about the right balance of enthusiasm and cynicism, recognized his own flaws, and appeared to have emerged from the wreckage of the Biggest Band Of All Time happier and more balanced than anyone else who was involved with it. However, there is a gender gap: men favored John, while women preferred Paul." :love:
Click to expand...
I also thought Paul was the cutest. But who would have thought that the "ugly" one, Ringo Starr, would look this good nowringo-starr.jpeg?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top