Rose65
Well-known Member
- Location
- United Kingdom
We all evaluate each other, it is amazing how many clues there are that indicate to us the intelligence level of a person.
Personally I think the vocabulary used by a person is a good indicator, also quick wit to make others laugh. Certainly many professional comedians are highly intelligent. I think habitual readers are likely wiser. Being talkative may not mean real intelligence but could be. I tend to think a quiet listener who summarises their points briefly is clever.
True intelligence is surely the ability to evaluate and retain information, to be able to solve problems competently and to have a hunger for knowledge.
I don't think having qualifications and letters after your name necessarily means real intelligence. I've known truly stupid people who on paper ought to have been very clever. In contrast, a seemingly simple person can have real intelligence but they never got opportunities to prove it.
So how do you think you evaluate someone when first meeting them and then over time?
Personally I think the vocabulary used by a person is a good indicator, also quick wit to make others laugh. Certainly many professional comedians are highly intelligent. I think habitual readers are likely wiser. Being talkative may not mean real intelligence but could be. I tend to think a quiet listener who summarises their points briefly is clever.
True intelligence is surely the ability to evaluate and retain information, to be able to solve problems competently and to have a hunger for knowledge.
I don't think having qualifications and letters after your name necessarily means real intelligence. I've known truly stupid people who on paper ought to have been very clever. In contrast, a seemingly simple person can have real intelligence but they never got opportunities to prove it.
So how do you think you evaluate someone when first meeting them and then over time?