Pot is Legal on Dec.7 in Ohio,Now Lawmakers Trying to Change What Was Specified By Voters!

Nathan said:
I'll attach the recipe, which is the basic Keto fat bomb. I subtract a little of the peanut butter and add the canna butter.
Click to expand...
Oh if it's got peanut butter! Yum! I once heard that peanut butter isn't used in Europe and I can't imagine that. I wonder if it's just because they can't grow peanuts so never got used to it or ???? Maybe somebody here on SF could tell us why the aversion to peanut butter.

Anyway, thanks Nathan, I might be trying a new recipe soon. ☺️
 
Debrah N. said:
Oh if it's got peanut butter! Yum! I once heard that peanut butter isn't used in Europe and I can't imagine that. I wonder if it's just because they can't grow peanuts so never got used to it or ???? Maybe somebody here on SF could tell us why the aversion to peanut butter.

Anyway, thanks Nathan, I might be trying a new recipe soon. ☺️
Click to expand...
I'd be expecting @hollydolly to be weighting in on that...
 

Robb.hisself said:
In my state, California, we have a referendum process that 'allows' grass root legislation by placing measures on the ballot for voters to vote on - called direct democracy. However, we often must endure long periods where after passage a law must next winde its way through the courts to decide its constitutionality. I've mentioned this just to let you know your experience is not unique or unusual. Legislatures hate direct democracy because it undercuts their purpose so well. Their purpose being absorbing all the under the table payoffs for legislative action and inaction. o_O
Click to expand...

I hate 'direct democracy' too. It is mostly the plaything of big money interests looking to get still more advantage than they already enjoy. What I most dislike is that these tend to be decided on the basis of nonstop advertising, once again making it a tool for those with money. Worst of all I have no paid research staff which all the legislators have and so must waste my time getting to understand the often convoluted wording of proposition, even though the outcome will be decided by based on disinformation campaigns for the most part.

I loved the idea in high school but now I recognize that the people we pay to represent us use it to avoid taking a well researched stand when doing so can make them unpopular enough to lose an election. I say make them do their damn job.
 
MarkD said:
I hate 'direct democracy' too. It is mostly the plaything of big money interests looking to get still more advantage than they already enjoy. What I most dislike is that these tend to be decided on the basis of nonstop advertising, once again making it a tool for those with money. Worst of all I have no paid research staff which all the legislators have and so must waste my time getting to understand the often convoluted wording of proposition, even though the outcome will be decided by based on disinformation campaigns for the most part.

I loved the idea in high school but now I recognize that the people we pay to represent us use it to avoid taking a well researched stand when doing so can make them unpopular enough to lose an election. I say make them do their damn job.
Click to expand...
And what is their dam job?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top