GW's Speaking fees

QuickSilver said:
Which one of the 14 billionaires who will decide our election do you like?
Click to expand...

The Only one I've heard anything saying anything resembling Common Sense, so far, is Bernie Sanders...and he doesn't stand a snowballs chance. The winner in 2016 will, once again. be the candidate who throws the most money at the election. Then, per normal, he/she will be obligated to bow to the wishes of the ultra wealthy.
 

Don M. said:
The Only one I've heard anything saying anything resembling Common Sense, so far, is Bernie Sanders...and he doesn't stand a snowballs chance. The winner in 2016 will, once again. be the candidate who throws the most money at the election. Then, per normal, he/she will be obligated to bow to the wishes of the ultra wealthy.
Click to expand...

Don't count Bernie out... Do you know that in the Democratic Wisconsin straw poll Hillary got 49% and Bernie got 41%. AND the Sanders campaign didn't even know there WAS a poll. It was as much a surprise to them as US.. So imagine if the Sanders campaign would have worked it?

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/wisconsin-straw-poll-surprise-a-narrow-clinton-win-118727.html
 
I think Bernie Sander's "message" would fit in nicely with the wishes of the vast majority of our people. However, the other candidates will be amassing vast sums of money to saturate our TV, etc., with a massive propaganda campaign, and the bulk of the voters will base their decisions on yet another huge misinformation blitz.
 

Despite the fact that I have lowered my speaking fee to only $25,000 USD plus travel expenses for a full 15 minutes I have had very few scheduled.
 
At least for this one time, we won't need to avoid Obama as being a good and honest politician. He isn't and has not been.
 
AZ Jim said:
Still trying for the laughs Bob?...*lol lol lol lol.lol....
Click to expand...

No laughs needed, just some honest comments for the way Obama has acted and how he has cheated the US out of a decent debt listing and pushed it to twice what it was when he became President of our nation. That is only one of his many mistakes and wrong ways to treat the people of the US. Time for him to be gone and replaced with one of the many who are attempting to get elected. I keep saying Hillary will be a lot better that what we have today. Still say so.
 
More about Obama's debt he created for the US with no justifications at all. He has taken what was about 10 trillion when he took over after a couple of far left liberals drove Bush's debt from about 7.5 trillion on up to about 10 trillion in two years. Then Obama took over and the debt never stopped climbing till today's level of about $18 trillion today. It will be a great relief to the US when Obama is gone and I consider Hillary to be a much less threat than Obama.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...a_administration/obama_approval_index_history
[h=2]Obama Approval Index History[/h]
Date
Approval Index
Strongly Approve
Strongly Disapprove
Total Approve
Total Disapprove
12-Jun-15
-20
21%
41%
45%
53%
11-Jun-15
-17
23%
40%
47%
52%
10-Jun-15
-15
24%
39%
48%
50%
09-Jun-15
-14
24%
38%
49%
49%
08-Jun-15
-13
25%
38%
48%
50%
05-Jun-15
-17
23%
40%
47%
51%
04-Jun-15
-15
24%
39%
47%
51%
 
Yes Bob.... If the "Rasmussen Report" says so .... well.. it's must be true.. :rolleyes:

But I have to ask you... WHAT does Obama's approval rating history have to do with the topic of GW's and Hillary's speaking fees? Just how does it tie in to this thread? Perhaps it's just something you want to talk about?
 
Well, you know that Obama just can't wait to get out of office and start making those big speaking fees, too...
 
Unfortunately the Obama King has not allowed the right to slow him down one bit. Obama's debt just keeps on piling up and that is definitely going to hurt the US for many years too come. Maybe, whomever gets elected this next election will want to return the country to its Constitutional ways and forget all this corrupt nonsense Obama has started. I think Hillary could be one to start that or maybe one of the other Democrat or Republican candidate types. Obama will be gone and whomever gets elected for the next many election years will have the unfortunate job of trying to put the US back together again.

These ultra far left ways of running the government need to be brought back closer to the middle again. Our Constitutionally set up Congress are supposed to run this country. Not some way off far left President making the government do far too much of his personal ideas and not just from the Congress as it should be.
 
BobF said:
Unfortunately the Obama King has not allowed the right to slow him down one bit. Obama's debt just keeps on piling up and that is definitely going to hurt the US for many years too come. Maybe, whomever gets elected this next election will want to return the country to its Constitutional ways and forget all this corrupt nonsense Obama has started. I think Hillary could be one to start that or maybe one of the other Democrat or Republican candidate types. Obama will be gone and whomever gets elected for the next many election years will have the unfortunate job of trying to put the US back together again.

These ultra far left ways of running the government need to be brought back closer to the middle again. Our Constitutionally set up Congress are supposed to run this country. Not some way off far left President making the government do far too much of his personal ideas and not just from the Congress as it should be.
Click to expand...

You continue to ignore the facts in favor of your Faux propaganda which you rely on for data. Enjoy your fantasies.
 
Our national debt is not something to ignore at all. It is real and we do not have a nice convenient way of paying it down. Under Clinton it was going down but now, with the far far left in control, it just keeps on growing in large margins. It is our Congress that is supposed to do the debating and spending, not a out of control President Obama.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top