dbeyat45
Professional Stirrer
- Location
- SE Queensland, Australia
There are no guarantees of that Phil .....[ Snip ]
I'd rather die with my dignity intact.![]()
:notfair:
I've had my dignity shredded many times ......
:wink:
There are no guarantees of that Phil .....[ Snip ]
I'd rather die with my dignity intact.![]()
I don't drive the wrong way on one-way streets, I don't go in the Out exit and I don't get colonoscopies. Very simple.
At 73, still ain't had one. Prolly 'cause not enough symptoms to force doctors to enforce convictions! I know, I know. But, scrapping all the argument, if my first one at 50 had revealed,......or at 60 had revealed..... or I've just been lucky, or fortunate?
My friend, Charlie, born 7 days after me, known him since sophomore in high school, almost 60 years, had colonoscopy first time, years ago, found polyps, some removed. Later, "seeds" (radioactive), introduced into his prostate (3 years ago), now, kidney stones, 2, one of them 1.4 cm, other .5 cm, two days hence he gets anesthesia, a ureter stent to cover possible blockage of the big one, sonic shock therapy to break them up.
I understand the medics' method there. The bigger one might fracture into potentially ureter-blocking pieces, can't do sonic shock only on the smaller one, so, a "stone & a hard place". Years back, the bigger one meant kidney removal, and the smaller leave alone, until dislodged, and blocks ureter.
Poor Charlie! My old friend besieged by such health problems while his old buddy here is just hanging out. I AM a very fortunate old bastard, don't no one deny it!
(What's the forum stand on profanity?)..............imp
I haven't had one either, and don't intend to get one unless I think it's mandatory. I take an annual fecal occult test at home, and that's about it. A relative of mine had regular colonoscopies, then one time after removing growths like they always do, he was diagnosed with colon cancer. After removing part of his colon and doing the usual toxic chemo and radiation, the cancer spread to his prostate, after they operated on that and "treated" that cancer, he had cancer then in his liver.
Needless to say, after much pain and suffering for years, and lots of money spent for hospital and doctor treatments, he died at home (hospital bed, hospice care, IV pain drips, etc.) at the age of 65. Before this he was healthy, mainly vegetarian, healthy diet, runner when younger, didn't drink or smoke. I know people will disagree with me, but I think that these types of invasive tests can actually cause cancer, or at least, cause the cancer to spread.
My condolences AprilSun, I too have lost family who suffered a similar fate with the cancer treatments. Don't apologize, you are wise to share your opinion here for others, although not all of us will agree with the testing.