King Charles III First Official Portrait Has Mixed Reviews. Poll

What Do You Think Of King Charles III Official Portrait?

  • I Like It

    Votes: 4 7.4%

  • I Don't Like it

    Votes: 34 63.0%

  • Well Done

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • It's Okay

    Votes: 3 5.6%

  • Mixed Feelings

    Votes: 12 22.2%
  • Total voters
    54
Happyflowerlady said:
I think that @Meanderer is correct, and this portrait will immortalize the king. This is a very strange portrait, with what looks looks like blood on his face and his hands. One Monarch butterfly….. what does that signify ?
Someone posted it as a mirror image, and that has something awful looking in between the two images. I wonder what the British people think of this portrait ?


View attachment 346021
Click to expand...


Photoshopped !!
 

Mizmo said:
Whatever floats your boat
Click to expand...
No "Photoshopping" required. Just place it next to a mirrored copy.

I'm not sure you understand what an accusation of Photoshopping implies. I don't think there's anything to it, but we can't just discount the eeriness out of hand as fraudulent. It just doesn't mean anything.
 
dilettante said:
Um, you can do it yourself:

View attachment 346045

Bunny ears or the wings of a smaller demon astride a beast?

In any case it may well be entirely coincidence.
Click to expand...

Question. Wasn't the artist monitored by anyone while doing the painting?? And even Charles and Camilla had to wait for this public unveiling without any clue as to what it looked like?

And it took social media to reveal a satanic image, a Baphomet Face, when putting 2 images together of the painting? I see it too. Can you?

I can also see a Laughing Skeleton Face/Demon on the Rabbit's chin (just below the rabbit's mouth) with a toothy Skeleton smile and it's hands on it's cheeks. You have to stare at it just right but it's there. The Rabbits chin is the skeleton's forehead...scary. Coincidence? Really?

Our world has changed. Protect the Royal Family like never before. No more surprise unveilings. Sad.
 
CallMeKate said:
I have *no* idea what kind of website this is, but it speaks more of the mirror image and what people are saying. But I'm posting it to show that to make matters even worse, they put that thing in a beautiful room and it stands out like the proverbial sore thumb. 😲

CREEPY: Mirrored Image of King Charles III's New Portrait Allegedly Reveals Baphomet Face | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Click to expand...

Seriously - this type of story is akin to a report that Elvis has just beamed down from a flying saucer to announce his new tour dates. I mean seriously - this is what people spend time on. Ouch.
 
VaughanJB said:
Seriously - this type of story is akin to a report that Elvis has just beamed down from a flying saucer to announce his new tour dates. I mean seriously - this is what people spend time on. Ouch.
Click to expand...
Yes... which is why I said the story is about "what people are saying",
(Meaning no one is saying any of it's true, it's just adding thoughts to this discussion.)
 
Last edited:
Jonathan's Yeo's portrait is, I think, a wonderful break from tradition, depicting a modern 21st Century King. I love it because the artist has done exactly what artists are suppose to do, which is to produce a work of art that is so incredibly different that it moves the viewer to have an opinion. It doesn't really matter if someone understands it or even whether they like it or not, what matters is the impact.

I think it is to Jonathan Yeo's credit that he obviously wanted to create a modern portrait, far removed from those of the past. He undoubtedly knew that it would create controversy and it has but, that is what great art should do.
 
Last edited:
Trish said:
Jonathan's Yeo's portrait is, I think, a wonderful break from tradition, depicting a modern 21st Century King. I love it because the artist has done exactly what artists are suppose to do, which is to produce a work of art that is so incredibly different that it moves the viewer to have an opinion. It doesn't really matter if someone understands it or even whether they like it or not, what matters is the impact.

I think it is to Jonathan Yeo's credit that he obviously wanted to create a modern portrait, far removed from those of the past. He undoubtedly knew that it would create controversy and it has but, that is what great art should do.
Click to expand...
The Kings eyes aren't black. The right and left photo chop shows a creature between them.
 
IMG_0282.jpeg "Dam it another pen won't work. I am jinxed with a pen hoax / load of crap," said He. "Goddammit get me a working pen I command you!"
 

Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top