Bush, the GOP's idea of a good President

AZ Jim

R.I.P. With Us In Spirit Only
Here is the same guy who never saw combat, who slept out his obligation in his Texas daddies National Guard really "helps" wounded troops.


To Help US Veterans Charity, George W. Bush Charged $100,000

news.yahoo.com/help-us-veterans-charity-george-w-bush-charged-225504539.html
By MEGAN CHUCHMACH and BRIAN ROSS 17 hours ago



Former President George W. Bush charged $100,000 to speak at a charity fundraiser for U.S. military veterans severely wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan, and former First Lady Laura Bush collected $50,000 to appear a year earlier, officials of the Texas-based Helping a Hero charity confirmed to ABC News.
The former President was also provided with a private jet to travel to Houston at a cost of $20,000, the officials said.
The charity, which helps to provide specially-adapted homes for veterans who lost limbs and suffered other severe injuries in “the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said the total $170,000 expenditure was justified because the former President and First Lady offered discounted fees and helped raise record amounts in contributions at galas held in 2011 and 2012.
“It was great because he reduced his normal fee of $250,000 down to $100,000,” said Meredith Iler, the former chairman of the charity.

However, a recent report by Politico said the former President’s fees typically ranged between $100,000 and $175,000 during those years.
One of the wounded vets who served on the charity’s board told ABC News he was outraged that his former commander in chief would charge any fee to speak on behalf of men and women he ordered into harm's way.
“For him to be paid to raise money for veterans that were wounded in combat under his orders, I don’t think that’s right,” said former Marine Eddie Wright, who lost both hands in a rocket attack in Fallujah, Iraq in 2004.
“You sent me to war,” added Wright speaking of the former President. “I was doing what you told me to do, gladly for you and our country and I have no regrets. But it’s kind of a slap in the face.”



Former first lady Laura Bush speaks at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation's Hiring Our Hero …

Bill Clinton Cashed In When Hillary Became Secretary of State
Clinton Foundation Taking Money From Accused Rights Violator
Do you have information about this or another story? CLICK HERE to send your confidential tip in to Brian Ross and the ABC News Investigative Unit.
Former U.S. Presidents have turned the speaker’s circuit into a major source of income for their post-presidential years. Ronald Reagan faced criticism in 1989 for accepting $2 million for speeches in Japan. Bill Clinton has brought in more than $100 million in post-presidential speaking fees. Bush, similarly, recognized the opportunity, reportedly telling author Robert Draper he planned to "replenish the ol' coffers" on the lecture circuit. But as the commander-in-chief responsible for the prosecution of two bloody wars, Bush has faced a unique dilemma when it has come to addressing military veterans groups.
A spokesperson for former President Bill Clinton said he "has never received" a speaking fee for addressing a veterans' group. A spokesperson for former President Bush’s father, George Herbert Walker Bush, said it has been several years since the elder Bush had given a speech, but said that he did not recall a fee being requested for charity events. On a “handful of occasions” Bush Sr.'s appearance may have been underwritten to cover costs for the charities, spokesman Jim McGrath said. H.W. Bush reportedly appeared at a Helping a Hero event in 2008.
Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was the featured speaker at last year’s Helping a Hero charity fundraiser and did not charge a fee. A representative for former President Jimmy Carter said he does not have a specific policy but often donates his honoraria to the Carter Center.
A lawyer for Helping a Hero, Christopher Tritico, said he could not answer why former President George W. Bush did not speak for free.
“I think it's a valid question for the former President,” he said. “It's not a valid question for a charity who raised an extra million dollars.”
According to the charity’s yearly reports to the IRS, it raised about $2,450,000, after expenses, from the 2012 gala where President Bush spoke. The following year, the gala netted the charity substantially less, about $1,000,000.
Speaking and traveling fees for the former President were paid by the charity, but the amount was underwritten by a private donor, the charity lawyer said.
A spokesperson for the former President, Freddy Ford, confirmed the payment but declined to comment on the criticism over the $100,000 speaking fee from the veterans' charity.
In an e-mail statement, Ford said, “President Bush has made helping veterans one of his highest priorities in his post presidency.”
He said the former President has hosted golf tournaments and mountain bike rides for veterans and was working on the Bush Institute’s Military Service Initiative to help “give returning veterans the first-class support they deserve.”
CLICK HERE to follow the Brian Ross Investigative Unit on Facebook.
 

Anyone want to defend this?

The only inkling of a defense would be the record amount of money raised at the event(what's that number again). But as stated he sent/ordered the affected troops to a fate that needs events like this to correct/offset someone else's or in this case his decision.

I want to focus on this but this is like a government or private sectors union dream of job security-create problem then get paid to fix it.
 

So far, in this 21st Century, we have had a couple of real "Doozies" occupying the White House....IMO. The bad thing is that with the current crop of announced candidates, it appears that we may have to live with "3 In a Row".
 
Don had this President been given a fair shake he would have been more effective as it is he will go down in history as one of the best. He had everything against him from day one.
 
Anyone want to defend this?

Not defending their speech charges. All politicians seem to do this, including Clinton and Obama, and others. Seems pretty high no matter who it is.

Just no end of this personal attacks on this forum. No need for such personal hate at all.
 
Don had this President been given a fair shake he would have been more effective as it is he will go down in history as one of the best. He had everything against him from day one.

It is a Given that each new President must devote some time to correcting the mistakes of the previous administration. History will begin to judge Obama's Presidency in another decade or two. Obama has certainly had his fair share of hostility from Congress...but that is Not without Precedence. Think back to the days of Reagan, when Tip O'Neill was the Speaker of the House. Those two fought like cats and dogs over every issue that came up. However, at the end of the day, they got together in private, and found a way to compromise, and move things forward. They probably had a "beer summit", and had an intelligent discussion...out of the media limelight...and ironed out their differences. How many times do you think that Obama and Boehner have sat down together to discuss an issue? How many times do you think that Obama has extended such an invitation?? The closest thing to a "beer summit" that Obama has initiated was back in his early days as President when the media jumped all over an incident between a Black professor, and a White cop who was responding to a 911 call about a home break in.

Nope, I'm quite sure that Barack Obama is a very nice person....but, IMO, he has come up Very Short in the Leadership Skills arena.
 
Not defending their speech charges. All politicians seem to do this, including Clinton and Obama, and others. Seems pretty high no matter who it is.

Just no end of this personal attacks on this forum. No need for such personal hate at all.
Bob would you kindly point out the "personal attacks" on this post? I really want to understand you but man it is very hard.
 
Not defending their speech charges. All politicians seem to do this, including Clinton and Obama, and others. Seems pretty high no matter who it is.
All politicians seem to do this, including Clinton and Obama


Bush was the President who sent these men into combat, they were wounded, lost limbs in his war. He of all people should not think of stealing 120 thousand dollars from them, but that is what he did. Clinton charges for some speeches but NEVER charged the wounded vets. Obama does not charge to speak at all as he is a setting President.

Just no end of this personal attacks on this forum. No need for such personal hate at all.

Bob would you kindly point out the "personal attacks" on this post? I really want to understand you but man it is very hard.
 
Bob would you kindly point out the "personal attacks" on this post? I really want to understand you but man it is very hard.


Haven't you figured it out? If you disagree with what Bob thinks... or dislike one of the politicians he likes... it's a personal attack...
 
It is a Given that each new President must devote some time to correcting the mistakes of the previous administration. History will begin to judge Obama's Presidency in another decade or two. Obama has certainly had his fair share of hostility from Congress...but that is Not without Precedence. Think back to the days of Reagan, when Tip O'Neill was the Speaker of the House. Those two fought like cats and dogs over every issue that came up. However, at the end of the day, they got together in private, and found a way to compromise, and move things forward. They probably had a "beer summit", and had an intelligent discussion...out of the media limelight...and ironed out their differences. How many times do you think that Obama and Boehner have sat down together to discuss an issue? How many times do you think that Obama has extended such an invitation?? The closest thing to a "beer summit" that Obama has initiated was back in his early days as President when the media jumped all over an incident between a Black professor, and a White cop who was responding to a 911 call about a home break in.

Nope, I'm quite sure that Barack Obama is a very nice person....but, IMO, he has come up Very Short in the Leadership Skills arena.


Obama is our first black President, don't let's pretend it didn't matter.
 
bfv.jpgI don't care what his brother did in the White House,Jeb is his own man.
Unless someone comes along better,I think Ill stick with him.
 
Bob would you kindly point out the "personal attacks" on this post? I really want to understand you but man it is very hard.

Why do folks have to make such an issue out of Republican or Democrat on this forum. Why not post some facts without attempting to smear someone. I do it myself when forced to defend a post I put up. Why is the US economy so bad as it is these days? Because of our current government and that means our leaderless President is the problem.

There I have just done so. I wish I had more definition but that is hard to find in a secret acting government. Why are we not having public debates in the Congress as we should have. None as our leader just doesn't care as long as things go his way. All our spending should go through debates in our Congress, not just some idea for billions of dollars as our President demands. All his items to spend on should be brought forward in the Congress and debated and the idea modified, upgraded, reduced, or tossed as the Congress determines.

There you go Jim, just putting folks down for being a Republican so I respond against our President for not allowing the spending to be debated and approved by items as it should be.

Republicans must be hated, Democrats must be hated, why? That is the point I keep trying to make. I have no problem saying good of a Democrat I feel is better than what we have. I have many times said I think Hillary will be better than what we have at least as far as the economy will go. She may also be better in other areas too.
 
Don had this President been given a fair shake he would have been more effective as it is he will go down in history as one of the best. He had everything against him from day one.

Jim, I'm a little confused here. :confused: Surely you're not talking about so-called "President" George W. Bush in this post?! Please clarify. Thanks!
 
Glinda, I was referring to the "fighter pilot hero" who played with obsolete jets in Texas while specifically directing on his National Guard entrance application "NO FOREIGN ASSIGNMENTS", yet sent thousands into battles in the Middle East. Now, he gets paid to help them raise private money to help these wounded and maimed heroes.
 
If this member of the Bush Crime Family manages to steal the presidency as his brother did, you can kiss your Social Security good-bye.

Very unlikely as Social Security is not a part of our budgets anyway. It is money taken from our employees wages and the employers finances too. I have proof of this if you want me to post it, I will. If you ever worked you should know this was always noted on your pay slip. SS XX.XX and that was your half of the taking and that money was put in a special fund only for uses by the SS department to meet their demands. Unfortunately the politicians keep taking from the SS fund for specific reasons. I wonder how they will ever pay back their borrowed funds to SS if the country keeps claiming to be broke with their high debt now of over 18 trillion dollars.
 


Back
Top