JBR
Senior Member
I think that's the big picture.Not given the current way overpopulated world controlled by myriad different political entities, each with different religions, philosophies, technology, resources, goals, that selfish wealthy persons with dog eat dog attitudes dominate.
For a lot of years, I held the hope that, at least in Canada, and possibly the U.S., we would eradicate poverty or at least reduce it to a tiny minimum. Having lived for three years or so in Vancouver, worked stints in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and so forth... and visited NYC... I encountered too many young people who just chose the wrong path. Meaning, they presented the definite impression that they'd freely chosen not to develop a career path, not to learn a legal skill, and simply to pursue fun, short-term excitement and highs. Often there didn't seem to be much interest making some decision about how to live healthy.
Well, it doesn't work out in the long term, and tends frequently to lead to homelessness and dependence on hard drugs. By no means does this account for all people in poverty. But it's a situation that seems to have grown a lot in the last half century.
There's the idea of socially-provided adequate housing. Even in some of Canada's smaller communities, there are some residents of tent camps who can't come to accept the necessity of commitments or rules, which amounts to a rejection of help. I think living together with other people at a scale that a society might attempt to provide, as a possibility more adequate than a tent camp, requires there be guidelines and commitments. So how can help be managed?
It's not that I like feeling this way. I don't. But it's just a feeling I can't shake. I'll be happy to consider the views of others... a brighter prospect on this situation.
Last edited: