Another religious thread of speculation

If one is thinking of unlimited empty space than its sort of easy to accept a spontaneous event putting Hydrogen and Helium in that empty space & with the growth of balls of fury.
Maybe Quantum Mechanics and particles connected over vast distances causes it to make the boom. Why should there be one when there is most likely unlimited room for many. U no H. isn't much to look at! Just because our Universe is expanding at increasing rate doesn't mean the others have to. Maybe they just become enormous black holes going boom again and again. Using the idea of anti-mater expansion or mater attraction.
 

Paco Dennis said:
Anecdotal evidence is always considered, and sometime the is a preponderance of such kinds of evidence...not facts. Rulings are made, all the time.
Click to expand...
I don't know eactly what part of this I should agree with and what part I should criticize but what it amounts to is, "I've never met God myself but My neigbour's sister-in-law's cousin said that he heard from his boss at work that God spoke to him in a dream. And by the way, his mailman says he's a nice guy who always leaves a tip during the holidays." Any ruling made with that as evidence is popycock.
 
Inept said:
I don't know eactly what part of this I should agree with and what part I should criticize but what it amounts to is, "I've never met God myself but My neigbour's sister-in-law's cousin said that he heard from his boss at work that God spoke to him in a dream. And by the way, his mailman says he's a nice guy who always leaves a tip during the holidays." Any ruling made with that as evidence is popycock.
Click to expand...
I needed help so I asked my educational AI to give me an example of a case being adjudicated by circumstantial evidence. If you don't mind. peplexity.ai :

Here's a simple example of a case decided by circumstantial evidence: The Case of the Missing Cookie. Imagine a mother bakes a batch of cookies and leaves them on the kitchen counter to cool. She tells her two children, Sarah and Tommy, not to eat any cookies before dinner. When the mother returns to the kitchen an hour later, she notices one cookie is missing.

The Circumstantial Evidence​

  • Sarah's bedroom door is closed, and she claims to have been reading the whole time.
  • Tommy is found playing video games in the living room.
  • There are cookie crumbs on the floor leading from the kitchen to the living room.
  • Tommy has chocolate smears around his mouth.
  • The TV remote control in the living room has a greasy fingerprint on it.

The Verdict​

Based on this circumstantial evidence, the mother concludes that Tommy ate the missing cookie
1
2
. While no one directly witnessed Tommy taking or eating the cookie, the combination of evidence points to his guilt:

  1. The crumb trail leads to where Tommy was found.
  2. The chocolate smears on his face suggest he recently ate something chocolatey.
  3. The greasy fingerprint on the remote indicates he touched it after handling food.
Although there's no direct evidence of Tommy eating the cookie, the circumstantial evidence creates a compelling case against him
3
. This example demonstrates how multiple pieces of indirect evidence can be used to draw a reasonable conclusion about what occurred, even without an eyewitness or direct proof
5
 
Inept said:
I don't know eactly what part of this I should agree with and what part I should criticize but what it amounts to is, "I've never met God myself but My neigbour's sister-in-law's cousin said that he heard from his boss at work that God spoke to him in a dream. And by the way, his mailman says he's a nice guy who always leaves a tip during the holidays." Any ruling made with that as evidence is popycock.
Click to expand...
Paco Dennis said:
..... a simple example of a case decided by circumstantial evidence: The Case of the Missing Cookie. Imagine a mother bakes a batch of cookies and leaves them on the kitchen counter to cool. She tells her two children, Sarah and Tommy, not to eat any cookies before dinner. When the mother returns to the kitchen an hour later, she notices one cookie is missing.

​

Click to expand...
Without proof of a cookie you have no case.
 
I choose Jury Nullification and each juror leaves with their own beliefs of what the outcome should have been.
 
With a great deal of effort, on everyone's part, I accept the win on behalf of all my colleagues. Yay team
 
papa tiger said:
If one is thinking of unlimited empty space than its sort of easy to accept a spontaneous event putting Hydrogen and Helium in that empty space & with the growth of balls of fury.
Maybe Quantum Mechanics and particles connected over vast distances causes it to make the boom. Why should there be one when there is most likely unlimited room for many. U no H. isn't much to look at! Just because our Universe is expanding at increasing rate doesn't mean the others have to. Maybe they just become enormous black holes going boom again and again. Using the idea of anti-mater expansion or mater attraction.
Click to expand...

But everything has a cause. Empty space could have no 'spontaneous event'.
But a creator could create one.
 
JustDave said:
Tread drift is common in all forums. There are no rules against it. I wonder how many threads in this forum pass the coherence test, anyway? And what are the standards that must be met?
Click to expand...
"Coherence" = a wild animal that if captured is hard to domesticate. :LOL:
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top