The Mouse "Utopia" Experiment That Turned Into An Apocalypse

David777

Well-known Member
Location
Silicon Valley
@hollydolly was aghast as to why people didn't help the woman who was burnt alive by an illegal immigrant? People wonder why we are see so many horrendous shooting massacres? Suffering homeless people are everywhere in our urban areas while older folks wonder why is society so different today that such is allowed to happen?

Many formerly religious people have lost faith and have turned to drugs and pornography. Our real estate estate industries pushed by selfish Wall Street globalists are destroying our middle classes like they are acceptable prey while politicians ignore. In third world areas we regularly read of large numbers starving, wars, and suffering diseases.

This person see such as indirect symptoms of overpopulation in which people increasingly lose respect and care for other humans because there are so many with some individuals beginning to snap just like the white rats in the experiment below. I first saw the video decades ago during a PBS NOVA episode.

nova mice overpopulation experiment video - Yahoo Video Search Results

Universe 25: The Mouse "Utopia" Experiment That Turned Into An Apocalypse


https://www.iflscience.com/universe...periment-that-turned-into-an-apocalypse-60407

In this study, he took four breeding pairs of mice and placed them inside a "utopia". The environment was designed to eliminate problems that would lead to mortality in the wild. They could access limitless food via 16 food hoppers, accessed via tunnels, which would feed up to 25 mice at a time, as well as water bottles just above. Nesting material was provided. The weather was kept at 68°F (20°C), which for those of you who aren't mice is the perfect mouse temperature...

The experiment began, and as you'd expect, the mice used the time that would usually be wasted in foraging for food and shelter for having excessive amounts of sexual intercourse. About every 55 days, the population doubled as the mice filled the most desirable space within the pen, where access to the food tunnels was of ease.

When the population hit 620, that slowed to doubling around every 145 days, as the mouse society began to hit problems. The mice split off into groups, and those that could not find a role in these groups found themselves with nowhere to go.

"In the normal course of events in a natural ecological setting somewhat more young survive to maturity than are necessary to replace their dying or senescent established associates," Calhoun wrote in 1972. "The excess that find no social niches emigrate."

Here, the "excess" could not emigrate, for there was nowhere else to go. The mice that found themself with no social role to fill – there are only so many head mouse roles, and the utopia was in no need of a Ratatouille-esque chef – became isolated.

"Males who failed withdrew physically and psychologically; they became very inactive and aggregated in large pools near the center of the floor of the universe. From this point on they no longer initiated interaction with their established associates, nor did their behavior elicit attack by territorial males," read the paper. "Even so, they became characterized by many wounds and much scar tissue as a result of attacks by other withdrawn males."

The withdrawn males would not respond during attacks, lying there immobile. Later on, they would attack others in the same pattern. The female counterparts of these isolated males withdrew as well. Some mice spent their days preening themselves, shunning mating, and never engaging in fighting. Due to this they had excellent fur coats, and were dubbed, somewhat disconcertingly, the "beautiful ones".

The breakdown of usual mouse behavior wasn't just limited to the outsiders. The "alpha male" mice became extremely aggressive, attacking others with no motivation or gain for themselves, and regularly raped both males and females. Violent encounters sometimes ended in mouse-on-mouse cannibalism.

Despite – or perhaps because – their every need was being catered for, mothers would abandon their young or merely just forget about them entirely, leaving them to fend for themselves. The mother mice also became aggressive towards trespassers to their nests, with males that would normally fill this role banished to other parts of the utopia. This aggression spilled over, and the mothers would regularly kill their young. Infant mortality in some territories of the utopia reached 90 percent.

This was all during the first phase of the downfall of the "utopia". In the phase Calhoun termed the "second death", whatever young mice survived the attacks from their mothers and others would grow up around these unusual mouse behaviors. As a result, they never learned usual mice behaviors and many showed little or no interest in mating, preferring to eat and preen themselves, alone.

The population peaked at 2,200 – short of the actual 3,000-mouse capacity of the "universe" – and from there came the decline. Many of the mice weren't interested in breeding and retired to the upper decks of the enclosure, while the others formed into violent gangs below, which would regularly attack and cannibalize other groups as well as their own. The low birth rate and high infant mortality combined with the violence, and soon the entire colony was extinct. During the mousepocalypse, food remained ample, and their every need completely met...


This 24 minute video goes into much more detail and analysis.

nova mice overpopulation experiment video - Yahoo Video Search Results
 

yeI understand the point you're making David.. but surely you're not saying these appalling inhumane acts are caused by over population...? or am I missing a point somewhere ? :unsure:
 
I blame it on Milton Friedman and the notion that the only thing that matters is profits. The U.S. fully embraced that ideology beginning in the 1980s, and that marked the beginning of the end of American exceptionalism.
 

yeI understand the point you're making David.. but surely you're not saying these appalling inhumane acts are caused by over population...? or am I missing a point somewhere ? :unsure:
Indeed, not caused by but IMO rather are significant contributing aggravating factors that ought be addressed given our supposed intelligence. The more humans there are, the more they will compete within limited resources, the more likelihood of conflict. The greater a wealth gap in a materialistic world, the more likely, those have-nots, will use less than ethical and morals processes to attain whatever. Ideally when there is an abundance of whatever key resource, like say food productive rich riverside lands, people will share as a cooperative community until such lands are limited pushing too many have-nots into the droughty desert beyond where they then cause conflict taking by sometimes unethical means and physical force what haves have.

The more people there are in a vast complex technological era world with myriad social and cultural issues and conflicts, where fairness and equality are not factors, with many weaker left damaged by the competitive reality, the more such will tend to create more psychologically flawed and damaged, especially for those unfavored by an array of complex life circumstances.
 
Last edited:
IMO other "de-humanizing: factors are ..

TV and Movie emphasizing violence
"Me" gyration's emphasis on satisfying oneself
Diminishing religious influence
Political divisions (e.g. "deplorables and "garbage")
 
yeI understand the point you're making David.. but surely you're not saying these appalling inhumane acts are caused by over population...? or am I missing a point somewhere ? :unsure:
Is true. Overpopulation is the culprit. We studied this back in the 70s...there was a big push for controlling population grow. No one took it seriously as the result is just too horrendous to think about.

Ever watch "Logan's Run?".

Hence, I became a space exploration enthusiast.
 
...fairness and equality are not factors, with many weaker left damaged by the competitive reality, the more such will tend to create more psychologically flawed and damaged, especially for those unfavored by an array of complex life circumstances.
It will all come down to survival of the fittest: brains, brawn. Even the rich will not have an advantage as money will fall by the wayside LONG before brains and brawn.
 
Overcrowding is not overpopulation, and the looming threat is actually depopulation. In much of Asia this has already reached alarming proportions, and now a good deal of Europe is staring down the barrel of the same gun. Canada is in dire straights, which is why there had been a huge push for enhanced immigration until that exploding cigar blew up in their faces much as it is in Europe today.

Yes, there was a successful mob culture profiteering venture in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It hawked unscientific books like The Population Bomb and benighted movements like Zero Population Growth which can be credited with causing the global crisis we're just beginning to face now that predicted trends have materialized.

But the crowding of hyperurbanization is a separate problem, and not one addressed by letting depopulation run its course. Our failing is in allowing urban culture (and by extension, globalization) to become the mass-marketed picture of normality, something that it is not and has never been. If the population fell to 10 million worldwide, right now they'd all huddle in one spot and continue eating each other due to their conditioning.

This isn't something you can just "fix." We are now pretty far down the road of depopulation as well as the seemingly contradictory overcrowding.
 
Overcrowding is not overpopulation, and the looming threat is actually depopulation. In much of Asia this has already reached alarming proportions, and now a good deal of Europe is staring down the barrel of the same gun. Canada is in dire straights, which is why there had been a huge push for enhanced immigration until that exploding cigar blew up in their faces much as it is in Europe today.

Yes, there was a successful mob culture profiteering venture in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It hawked unscientific books like The Population Bomb and benighted movements like Zero Population Growth which can be credited with causing the global crisis we're just beginning to face now that predicted trends have materialized.

But the crowding of hyperurbanization is a separate problem, and not one addressed by letting depopulation run its course. Our failing is in allowing urban culture (and by extension, globalization) to become the mass-marketed picture of normality, something that it is not and has never been. If the population fell to 10 million worldwide, right now they'd all huddle in one spot and continue eating each other due to their conditioning.

This isn't something you can just "fix." We are now pretty far down the road of depopulation as well as the seemingly contradictory overcrowding.
Overcrowding is the term. Yes there are some predictions it could be depopulation.

What push for "enhanced immigration" do you speak of?
 
Overcrowding is not overpopulation, and the looming threat is actually depopulation. In much of Asia this has already reached alarming proportions, and now a good deal of Europe is staring down the barrel of the same gun. Canada is in dire straights, which is why there had been a huge push for enhanced immigration until that exploding cigar blew up in their faces much as it is in Europe today.

Yes, there was a successful mob culture profiteering venture in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It hawked unscientific books like The Population Bomb and benighted movements like Zero Population Growth which can be credited with causing the global crisis we're just beginning to face now that predicted trends have materialized.

But the crowding of hyperurbanization is a separate problem, and not one addressed by letting depopulation run its course. Our failing is in allowing urban culture (and by extension, globalization) to become the mass-marketed picture of normality, something that it is not and has never been. If the population fell to 10 million worldwide, right now they'd all huddle in one spot and continue eating each other due to their conditioning.

This isn't something you can just "fix." We are now pretty far down the road of depopulation as well as the seemingly contradictory overcrowding.
The immigration issue blew up as a result of the governments failure to encourage continued building of housing for lower income folks and contractors all jumping on the bandwagon of building bigger, fancier housing with all kinds of bells and whistles. Also, after covid, with there being an expected shortage of workers, businesses began cheating the system by advertising jobs with low wages and when no Canadians applied for them because they weren't paying enough money to live on, those employers went to the government with the claim that 'poor me, I can't find any workers'.

Unfortunately, rather than investigating each application, it was pretty much rubber stamped so that they could then get temporary foreign workers. While these bosses were claiming no worker applications, we had a 6% unemployment rate. At the same time, we know that those employers aren't paying high wages to the TFW and not even providing living accommodations that were decent (if any).

With all these TFW's in the country and our housing price being pushed through the roof by the purchases of low cost housing by real estate investment corporations who then renovated and put them out there for either higher rent or for sale, it was bound to happen that the general public would start howling about the situation. We still need immigration because our birth rate has fallen to about 1.2 babies per couple which isn't even close to replacing ourselves or maintaining the tax levels needed to run the country.
 
I see that Australia is in similar straights:

Why life in Australia has become Impossible


There is so much in common all over the world that surely there are deeper underlying factors that have extended into so many countries?

Maybe turn it on its head? What do countries without these problems have in common? What has changed recently for those who have suddenly developed these problems?
 
I see that Australia is in similar straights:

Why life in Australia has become Impossible


There is so much in common all over the world that surely there are deeper underlying factors that have extended into so many countries?

Maybe turn it on its head? What do countries without these problems have in common? What has changed recently for those who have suddenly developed these problems?
Maybe there's the same issue of real estate investment firms buying up apartment blocks and single family homes and renovating and pushing prices up. That is going on in Canada. And not enough building of low cost housing because the returns aren't as good as bigger, more ostentatious builds. In Canada, there are literally houses that are dumps, being sold for nearly a $million.

In my last community and just down the street from my apartment, a 900 square foot two story house would have sold for maybe $150,000, 15 years ago. When I moved from there three years ago, it was on the market for $800,000. At the time, it had no yard, no landscaping, needed a complete renovation in and out, was spray painted white (including over window edges because they were too lazy to tape off the glass and it was a wreck.

Real estate investors are pushing up prices and consumer homeowners are keeping up with that market when we sell which pushes up prices or at least helps hold them up there. It's been great for those of us who had the good fortune to buy a long time ago, but it's done terrible things to the young folks who want to get into their own home.
 
@hollydolly was aghast as to why people didn't help the woman who was burnt alive by an illegal immigrant? People wonder why we are see so many horrendous shooting massacres? Suffering homeless people are everywhere in our urban areas while older folks wonder why is society so different today that such is allowed to happen?

Many formerly religious people have lost faith and have turned to drugs and pornography. Our real estate estate industries pushed by selfish Wall Street globalists are destroying our middle classes like they are acceptable prey while politicians ignore. In third world areas we regularly read of large numbers starving, wars, and suffering diseases.

This person see such as indirect symptoms of overpopulation in which people increasingly lose respect and care for other humans because there are so many with some individuals beginning to snap just like the white rats in the experiment below. I first saw the video decades ago during a PBS NOVA episode.

nova mice overpopulation experiment video - Yahoo Video Search Results

Universe 25: The Mouse "Utopia" Experiment That Turned Into An Apocalypse


https://www.iflscience.com/universe...periment-that-turned-into-an-apocalypse-60407

In this study, he took four breeding pairs of mice and placed them inside a "utopia". The environment was designed to eliminate problems that would lead to mortality in the wild. They could access limitless food via 16 food hoppers, accessed via tunnels, which would feed up to 25 mice at a time, as well as water bottles just above. Nesting material was provided. The weather was kept at 68°F (20°C), which for those of you who aren't mice is the perfect mouse temperature...

The experiment began, and as you'd expect, the mice used the time that would usually be wasted in foraging for food and shelter for having excessive amounts of sexual intercourse. About every 55 days, the population doubled as the mice filled the most desirable space within the pen, where access to the food tunnels was of ease.

When the population hit 620, that slowed to doubling around every 145 days, as the mouse society began to hit problems. The mice split off into groups, and those that could not find a role in these groups found themselves with nowhere to go.

"In the normal course of events in a natural ecological setting somewhat more young survive to maturity than are necessary to replace their dying or senescent established associates," Calhoun wrote in 1972. "The excess that find no social niches emigrate."

Here, the "excess" could not emigrate, for there was nowhere else to go. The mice that found themself with no social role to fill – there are only so many head mouse roles, and the utopia was in no need of a Ratatouille-esque chef – became isolated.

"Males who failed withdrew physically and psychologically; they became very inactive and aggregated in large pools near the center of the floor of the universe. From this point on they no longer initiated interaction with their established associates, nor did their behavior elicit attack by territorial males," read the paper. "Even so, they became characterized by many wounds and much scar tissue as a result of attacks by other withdrawn males."

The withdrawn males would not respond during attacks, lying there immobile. Later on, they would attack others in the same pattern. The female counterparts of these isolated males withdrew as well. Some mice spent their days preening themselves, shunning mating, and never engaging in fighting. Due to this they had excellent fur coats, and were dubbed, somewhat disconcertingly, the "beautiful ones".

The breakdown of usual mouse behavior wasn't just limited to the outsiders. The "alpha male" mice became extremely aggressive, attacking others with no motivation or gain for themselves, and regularly raped both males and females. Violent encounters sometimes ended in mouse-on-mouse cannibalism.

Despite – or perhaps because – their every need was being catered for, mothers would abandon their young or merely just forget about them entirely, leaving them to fend for themselves. The mother mice also became aggressive towards trespassers to their nests, with males that would normally fill this role banished to other parts of the utopia. This aggression spilled over, and the mothers would regularly kill their young. Infant mortality in some territories of the utopia reached 90 percent.

This was all during the first phase of the downfall of the "utopia". In the phase Calhoun termed the "second death", whatever young mice survived the attacks from their mothers and others would grow up around these unusual mouse behaviors. As a result, they never learned usual mice behaviors and many showed little or no interest in mating, preferring to eat and preen themselves, alone.

The population peaked at 2,200 – short of the actual 3,000-mouse capacity of the "universe" – and from there came the decline. Many of the mice weren't interested in breeding and retired to the upper decks of the enclosure, while the others formed into violent gangs below, which would regularly attack and cannibalize other groups as well as their own. The low birth rate and high infant mortality combined with the violence, and soon the entire colony was extinct. During the mousepocalypse, food remained ample, and their every need completely met...


This 24 minute video goes into much more detail and analysis.

nova mice overpopulation experiment video - Yahoo Video Search Results

Not all formerly religious people have turned to drugs and pornography.
 
It's overcrowding that make people do strange things. That is the thing that was kind of discovered in the Rat Utopia Experiment. (Although I think that has been debunked now, I don't know for sure.)

I have lived in big cities with very high population. And smaller places with much lower population. In my opinion, and this is just my observations, I think the behaviour of people in less crowded environments is much better.

Where I live now is less crowded than other places I have lived and the people seem very polite and civil. There seems like there is more of a feeling of social cohesion and community.

In a big city that I lived in before I saw people doing very odd things while driving their cars. Or random fights breaking out on the subway. People snapping at each other.

We are not designed to live like that. It's not good for us mentally.
 
It's overcrowding that make people do strange things....

...I have lived in big cities with very high population. And smaller places with much lower population. In my opinion, and this is just my observations, I think the behaviour of people in less crowded environments is much better.

Where I live now is less crowded than other places I have lived and the people seem very polite and civil. There seems like there is more of a feeling of social cohesion and community.

In a big city that I lived in before I saw people doing very odd things while driving their cars. Or random fights breaking out on the subway. People snapping at each other.

We are not designed to live like that. It's not good for us mentally.
Agree with you 100%. Every time I get in heavy slow traffic or on a crowded street I feel like just another ant in an ant hill for some reason. OR a herd of cattle being herded, especially when leaving pro ball parks..."Moo, moo, moo...".

Then I also get worried someone is going to do something terribly stupid like yell "Fire"!! or "He has a gun"!! And get trampled by the mass of idiots. Reminds me of India or Pakistan.
 
There is also the theory of Dunbar's Number Theory in that we can only ever really know or integrate with 150 people at one time.

As creatures, we haven't really developed all that much since the times that we were hunter gatherers. Our bodies still cannot digest certain processed foods properly, like bread for example, and our minds cannot cope with living in overcrowded large cities.
 
I see that Australia is in similar straights:

Why life in Australia has become Impossible


There is so much in common all over the world that surely there are deeper underlying factors that have extended into so many countries?

Maybe turn it on its head? What do countries without these problems have in common? What has changed recently for those who have suddenly developed these problems?
Lots of food for thought.

1) Low interest rates;
2) Relaxed immigration policies;
3) Supply and demand imbalance causing housing prices to skyrocket.

The world gets more crowded and we are all paying the price.
 
There is also the theory of Dunbar's Number Theory in that we can only ever really know or integrate with 150 people at one time.

As creatures, we haven't really developed all that much since the times that we were hunter gatherers. Our bodies still cannot digest certain processed foods properly, like bread for example, and our minds cannot cope with living in overcrowded large cities.
150 is a lot of people; checked out Dunbar's theory...not sure I agree with the theory.
 


Back
Top