GB: No Freedom of Speech Anymore

Medusa said:
Yes, it does, which leaves you ultimately in a bit of a brick wall situation. However, you can at least be comforted in that, this being a public conversation, your valiant attempts here have been read by others as well.

At the very least, it's likely good exercise for the intellect.

I prefer chess puzzles for that; there's no ambiguity and the computer doesn't pretend it doesn't know what I mean when I move my knight.
Click to expand...

True. Once someone pretends not to understand a knight’s move, the game is already over.
 
Dr.Colosso said:
Who feels threatened? A muslim when a preacher evangelizes? A christian when he's dropped in the middle of nowhere for it by the police?
Some women feel threatened by men. If they walk around at night they think it's scary when a man walks behind em. Let the police pick up that man cause she feels scared? Or racist Karen is afraid of foreigners. Let the police pick them up because she's scared and drop em in the middle of nowhere like they did with that preacher? Nobody should care if someone is scared or feels whatever. As long as someone does nothing harmful and illegal then yes get over it.
Click to expand...
have you ever been scared? YOU, no one else.
Have you ever been scared?
 

rbtvgo said:
tell me what it feels like. Tell me what you wanted at that moment in time. Tell me how indifferent you felt at that moment.
No one should care if another feels scared or afraid?????????????????????
Click to expand...
I worded that wrong. I meant it doesn't matter for what they do about it. Someone feels scared. Take em to church and teach em perfect love drives out fear or something, but you can't arrest someone who is innocent because someone else is scared of them.

I'm not scared. I met a rapist in a wood at 11 pm biking alone as a teenage girl. I said: God is here. He was scared. He didn't dare to do a thing.
 
Last edited:
rbtvgo said:
tell me what it feels like. Tell me what you wanted at that moment in time. Tell me how indifferent you felt at that moment.
No one should care if another feels scared or afraid?????????????????????
Click to expand...
Of course they should care if it's genuine and they don't want you to get arrested for their fear, but if Karen says she feels scared cause a black guy barbecues nobody cares. Well I don't. I don't feel sorry for someone like that. Black kids afraid of a white guy okay that's awww.


 
Last edited:
Dr.Colosso said:
I worded that wrong. I meant it doesn't matter for what they do about it. Someone feels scared. Take em to church and teach em perfect love drives out fear or something, but you can't arrest someone who is innocent because someone else is scared of them.

I'm not scared. I met a rapist in a wood at 11 pm biking alone as a teenage girl. I said: God is here. He was scared. He didn't dare to do a thing.
Click to expand...
You have never been scared obviously.
Have a nice day
 
If this is free speech, something is fundamentally wrong:

G-SgGv5XUAAZALC.jpg
 
Rakaia said:
No freedom after speech for the Ford worker in the USA.
Click to expand...

That mixes up two very different things. Freedom of speech in the U.S. means protection from government punishment for expressing views, it was never meant to guarantee freedom from private employment consequences. A private company disciplining or firing an employee is not the same as the state silencing dissent. You can argue that employers often have too much power over workers, but calling this “no freedom after speech” misrepresents what free speech actually is and how it works.
 
Not sure where you are coming from. Freedom of speech is guaranteed according to the constitution. Private employment requires acceptance of the rules of an employment which is entirely acceptable.Don't like the rules, Don't go to work for the company. Pretty simple. What am I missing here?
 
Eva Vlaardingerbroek (well spoken Dutch conservative who opposes Starmer's open borders policy) has recently been banned from entering the UK.

Reason given : her presence in the UK is "not considered to be conducive to the public good".
 
The decline of global superpowers like Great Britain and the United States reflects a complex pattern of internal societal fragmentation reminiscent of historical imperial collapses. These nations appear to be experiencing significant systemic challenges that mirror the erosion of previous empires, characterized by increasing tensions between governmental institutions and their citizens.

The current state of these countries suggests a profound transformation, where traditional power structures are increasingly relying on military and law enforcement mechanisms to maintain control. This approach manifests through aggressive policing, widespread surveillance, and potential use of force against civilian populations, which echoes historical colonial control strategies.

The parallels between contemporary governance and colonial administration are increasingly apparent, with citizens experiencing restrictions on civil liberties and facing potential state-sanctioned interventions that challenge fundamental democratic principles. The military and security apparatus has become a primary tool for maintaining national cohesion, indicating a fundamental shift in the relationship between government and populace.

These dynamics suggest a profound reexamination of national identity, power structures, and the fundamental social contract between citizens and their governmental institutions, highlighting the complex challenges facing these historically influential global powers.
 
Paco Dennis said:
The decline of global superpowers like Great Britain and the United States reflects a complex pattern of internal societal fragmentation reminiscent of historical imperial collapses. These nations appear to be experiencing significant systemic challenges that mirror the erosion of previous empires, characterized by increasing tensions between governmental institutions and their citizens.

The current state of these countries suggests a profound transformation, where traditional power structures are increasingly relying on military and law enforcement mechanisms to maintain control. This approach manifests through aggressive policing, widespread surveillance, and potential use of force against civilian populations, which echoes historical colonial control strategies.

The parallels between contemporary governance and colonial administration are increasingly apparent, with citizens experiencing restrictions on civil liberties and facing potential state-sanctioned interventions that challenge fundamental democratic principles. The military and security apparatus has become a primary tool for maintaining national cohesion, indicating a fundamental shift in the relationship between government and populace.

These dynamics suggest a profound reexamination of national identity, power structures, and the fundamental social contract between citizens and their governmental institutions, highlighting the complex challenges facing these historically influential global powers.
Click to expand...
very well written and totally incomprehensible.
 
West Midlands Police banned Maccabi Tel Aviv fans due to security concerns, citing potential violence and intelligence about community tensions. The decision faced political backlash and revealed some intelligence issues, but the ban remains in effect for now.
 
seems we came from a warfaring fighting species and now moving back to one involving citizens against citizens and the forces of govt powers against the same citizens - as the globe spins so does human history perhaps?
 
rbtvgo said:
Not sure where you are coming from. Freedom of speech is guaranteed according to the constitution. Private employment requires acceptance of the rules of an employment which is entirely acceptable.Don't like the rules, Don't go to work for the company. Pretty simple. What am I missing here?
Click to expand...

It would be helpful to quote the person you’re replying to, so they’re aware of your response and can reply if they choose to.
 
smiley said:
seems we came from a warfaring fighting species and now moving back to one involving citizens against citizens and the forces of govt powers against the same citizens - as the globe spins so does human history perhaps?
Click to expand...
We ARE a war faring species. The leopard doesn't change its spots quite so easily.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top