Philadelphia City Attorney Vandalized A Building With Anti Trump Graffiti

Joe DeFelice, the chairman of the Philadelphia Republican Party, called on city officials to fire Lloyd "immediately" in a statement posted on the party's website titled, "Wine-Swilling, Blazer-Clad, Anti-Trump City Attorney: An Image of Bourgeois America, Enraged."
Click to expand...
Pretty dumb move, how dare a member of the Bourgeoisie rail against the uber-rich_right-wing overloard(s).

Attention City attorney Lloyd, deal with it!, it's too late to protest, the election is over, and a recount will just be viewed as "sour grapes".

After being fired, City attorney Lloyd will join the millions of other "under employed" 47% leeches* that the future Secretary of State Mitt Romney spoke of, in the last election.



* http://www.juancole.com/2012/09/tax-deadbeat-romney-calls-other-non-taxpayers-leeches.html
 
Setting aside the political rhetoric a white collar city employee/lawyer committing a crime like this? He does need to be fired. I don't care if was just taking pictures just standing by in a leisure suit with a wine in hand.
 

WhatInThe said:
Setting aside the political rhetoric a white collar city employee/lawyer committing a crime like this. No, he does need to be fired.
Click to expand...

As I alluded to, he was an idiot to have done that, even-though I do understand his reasons. Graffiti of anything for any reason is just plain vandalism, and not an acceptable method of expression, regardless of a person's economic or social status.
 
tnthomas said:
As I alluded to, he was an idiot to have done that, even-though I do understand his reasons. Graffiti of anything for any reason is just plain vandalism, and not an acceptable method of expression, regardless of a person's economic or social status.
Click to expand...

I still can't get over a white collar city employee/lawyer no less. This is a career ending move. To top it off they said the type of stone might need $10,000 to remove the paint.
 
Anybody can be stupid, but you have to admit, a white collar city employee/lawyer type will have more opportunities to recuperate from such employment/economic suicide, than a typical non- Bourgeois individual. Might even be a "stepping stone" to better paying opportunity, perhaps as a political commentator for some news media organization, or maybe some position in a non-right wing political organization, as the "poster-boy" of their ideology, kind of like Sarah Palin was/is.
 
tnthomas said:
As I alluded to, he was an idiot to have done that, even-though I do understand his reasons. Graffiti of anything for any reason is just plain vandalism, and not an acceptable method of expression, regardless of a person's economic or social status.
Click to expand...

I agree. It wasn't a "mistake," it was a willful act of vandalism, which is a crime. How would you spray paint graffiti by "mistake?"
 
Butterfly said:
I agree. It wasn't a "mistake," it was a willful act of vandalism, which is a crime. How would you spray paint graffiti by "mistake?"
Click to expand...

The offender can say anything he wants. But the mayor calling it a "mistake" is trying to down play an act one of his own committed. The mayor probably got him the job. Wonder what was in the wine.
 
Butterfly said:
I agree. It wasn't a "mistake," it was a willful act of vandalism, which is a crime. How would you spray paint graffiti by "mistake?"
Click to expand...

Here's the sad difference between the average citizen and political types:

When a political type does something illegal or stupid, it's called a "mistake"; when the ruckus blows over they usually stay in "the system".(AKA:some sort of political position).

When an average citizen does something illegal or stupid, it's called a "criminal offense"; when the ruckus blows over they usually stay in "the system"(AKA: prison).
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top