They don't deny the rising. It has been rising by millimeters per century. And it's not up to their necks. And they learn to ignore the ridiculous hype.
?Yes, but as I keep saying what have you or anyone else lost if the climate scientist have it all wrong?
If you can just put aside your worries or prejudice against climate scientists (why would they be any worse than any other scientist, and their work if published is subjected to "peer review" essentially other scientists criticising their work). There is nothing truer that untrammeled use of resources which are limited, such as fossil has to end somewhere, one day it will come when there isn't a piece of coal or a barrel of oil to be had, so why not take a "precautionary response" and limit their use as much as is feasible "just in case"
| [h=1]China to Ban Sale of Fossil Fuel Cars in Electric Vehicle Push[/h]China will set a deadline for automakers to end sales of fossil-fuel powered vehicles, a move aimed at pushing companies to speed efforts in developing electric vehicles for the world’s biggest auto market. Xin Guobin, the vice minister of industry and information technology, said the government is working with other regulators on a timetable to end production and sales. The move will have a profound impact on the environment and growth of China’s auto industry, Xin said at an auto forum in Tianjin on Saturday. A ban on combustion-engine vehicles will help push both local and global automakers to shift toward electric vehicles, a carrot-and-stick approach that could boost sales of energy-efficient cars and trucks and reduce air pollution while serving the strategic goal of cutting oil imports. The government offers generous subsidies to makers of new-energy vehicles. It also plans to require automakers to earn enough credits or buy them from competitors with a surplus under a new cap-and-trade program for fuel economy and emissions. https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/...-of-fossil-fuel-cars-in-electric-vehicle-push |
