A Royal question for the British

I don't know the guy. But there's the heir, and he's the spare. I'm not up on this, but I don't think he's even the spare anymore. Royal duties are presiding over the opening of hospital Xray depts, or Miss Ogalthrope's Dance School, and officiating at 140+ charity functions. Year after year after year. Plus, literally, everything he does or says is fodder for the tabloids. To me, it sounds the guy wants out of the family business, and that causes rifts in the family.
 

Last edited:
True. She's not only not of royal blood, she's not white enough. And she's (gasp) a common ACTOR!
stuff and nonsense. nothing to do with her colour ...that's what she wants people to think, but even those of colour don't believe it... . If in fact she hadn't been welcome because of her colour you can absolutely believe harry would not have been allowed to marry her, but in fact more pomp and ceremony was extended to her than anyone of Royal Birth, and she stabbed them in the eye... she in fact was showing just how common she is...
 
Last edited:
I think of Princess Diana, and how the British press made her life miserable .... She didn't deserve all that hate.

Harry is definitely his mother's son, and probably can't get far enough away from their endless bashing.
The sad memories of losing his mother, and how she died, will always be with him.
the British Press didn't hate Diana, neither did the people, they couldn't have loved her more...... Diana was the instigator of her own downfall...
 

the British Press didn't hate Diana, neither did the people, they couldn't have loved her more...... Diana was the instigator of her own downfall...


She was looking for happiness and love .... something that was totally missing in her marriage.
She had even stated that three people in a marriage doesn't work.
 
I don't know the guy. But there's the heir, and he's the spare. I'm not up on this, but I don't think he's not even the spare anymore. Royal duties are presiding over the opening of hospital Xray depts, or Miss Ogalthrope's Dance School, and officiating at 140+ charity functions. Year after year after year. Plus, literally, everything he does or says is fodder for the tabloids. To me, it sounds the guy wants out of the family business, and that causes rifts in the family.


Harry can't help the fact that he is a free spirit, and has a very out-going personality. People take to him all over the world.
If he were to ever divorce ... does anyone really think he would ever go running back to the royal family? ...it's not in his DNA
 
Last edited:
stuff and nonsense. nothing to do with her colour ...that's what she wants people to think, but even those of colour don't believe it... . If in fact she hadn't been welcome because of her colour you can absolutely believe harry would not have been allowed to marry her, but in fact more pomp and ceremony was extended to her than anyone of Royal Birth, and she stabbed them in the ey... she in fact was showing just how common she is...
Mhm, there's that "common" thing.....sorry, no royalty in the US....
 
She was looking for happiness and love .... something that was totally missing in her marriage.
She had even stated that three people in a marriage doesn't work.
..yes but she had an affair just 5 years into the marriage... which lasted 5 years, then loads of affairs after and during that... including 2 with married men. When one of her many affairs ( Oliver Hoare) refused to leave his wife for her she started harassing them, calling their house dozens of times and hanging up.. then when they called in the police and the police discovered the calls were coming from Diana's private phone she lied through her teeth saying that it was a young boy who was doing it... she was mentally unhinged..

Every man she had an affair with she planned to spend the rest of her life with them, and they all ran for their lives.. an affair was one thing.. but not marriage...

https://www.news.com.au/entertainme...e/news-story/8fafde06345a1fe37c51c50238fb1ded
 
From my link above, about Diana's death .. TIME Magazine

Our views, from another country.


The unspoken villain in his eulogy was the paparazzi and their sponsors on Fleet Street —
the notoriously hard-nosed, intrusive tabloid newspapers that remain a staple of British life. From the Murdoch-owned Sun and its competitors the Daily Mirror and the Daily Star to their middle-market cousins the Daily Mail and the Daily Express, these newspapers offer readers a daily helping of news and sport steeped in moralism and prurience, reflecting the obsessions of a broad stripe of the country’s middle class. Celebrity news remains the stock in trade, and twenty years after her death Diana’s “beloved boys” remain rich targets. Yet the manner in which Diana met her end did change the way the media approached the royals, and vice versa. This is the story of how it happened.


“Editors couldn’t get enough of her”​

In 1961, TIME explained the relatively new term “paparazzi” to its readers, comparing them to streetwalkers because “they cling to their place in society.” The article helped popularize the word synonymous today with the invasive photographers who pursue their celebrity quarries by any means necessary. “No one is safe [from them], not even royalty,” the 1961 article explained.

In the late 1960s, media mogul Rupert Murdoch entered the British newspaper industry and bought failing broadsheet the Sun. Knowing that the poorly-resourced paper would not beat its competitors on news, it turned its focus to features and, as people were watching television in ever-increasing numbers, centred its attention on the lives of actors both on and off-screen. “The content of his papers shifted towards a fascination with the sex and love lives of the famous,” wrote Kim McNamara in Paparazzi: Media Practices and Celebrity Culture. Other papers followed the Sun’s lead, including the News of the World – shut down in 2011 in the aftermath of Britain’s phone hacking scandal – which transformed from a broadsheet into a tabloid in 1984.

Tabloid newspapers, known as ‘red tops,’ developed into a staple in British society, with a unique reputation of being both rude and funny. “From the 18th century onwards, Britain has had this real disrespect for authority in print,” James Rodgers, Head of International Journalism Studies at City, University of London, told TIME. Over the past half-century or so, tabloids have been credited with holding a great deal of influence over the British public. As well as there being a long tradition of Murdoch’s papers backing the winning side in general elections, tabloids were credited with creating the public mood that led the U.K. to leave the European Union in the Brexit vote last year. However, the influence of tabloids was called into question following the U.K.’s snap election on June 8, when Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May – backed by all but one major tabloid – failed to secure an increased majority. “I think there are questions over the influence the popular newspapers have now and will continue to have in the future,” said Rodgers.
 
She invited the press to her home and gave them inside tips as to where and when she would be anywhere. She made a firm friend of Royal reporter for the Daily mail Richard Kay and invited him to clandestine meetings , sometimes in cars in side streets ... to tell him where she would be so he could get the best photos and stories... she lived by the sword and died by it...
 

Last edited:

Back
Top