A Survey for Fans of M*A*S*H TV Series

Do you think you could have lived in the "Swamp" with Hawkeye? I don't think I could. The character is too self-righteous for my taste. If anyone didn't see things his way, he got on a high horse.
He was wisecracking, quick-witted, above average in intelligence, soft-hearted, a helluva surgeon, and had his own freaking still! Heh, I would've spent whatever free time I had fooling around with Hawkeye up there right on his high horse. 😁
 

Watched it a few times, then 'never again.'

Death is not humorous, dealing with death week after week required some mechanism to continue dealing with torn bodies day after day,
Hawk Eye and others used humor.

Again, death of young men is not funny.

Moreover, what the hell were we doing in Korea. We promoted ourselves to be the world's policemen:-our young men payed the bill.

Politically, it was a Vietnam, but we 'thought' our leaders knew what was needed-they didn't! We trusted our leaders, there were murmurs
of discontent, but flush with now being a superpower like blind pigs we followed without question.
What you wrote that i made bold is why the show was important and why i didn't watch till summer rereuns. When it first came on the air while the tide of support for the Viet conflict was dwindling it continued for a while.

M*A*S*H was a way to bring up some of the issues without the pro-war defense mechanisms kicking in immediately. By the time the last US combat troops supposedly left Vietnam in '73 and certainly by time Saigon fell in 1975 millions of viewers figured out what i had: While the main theme discussed the horrors of war, it really explored so many other aspects of human nature, especially under pressure in a microcosmic representation of humanity.

Someone once described original Star Trek series as 'Wagon Train in outer space'. Fair enough, because both shows dealt with similar stories of how people far from home but some common goals bond and or clash with each other and with strangers met along the way.
 

O'Reilly did not replace Klinger. Both were integral parts of that program. I liked Maj. Burns over Winchester.
Yeah i was not going to answer that because Klinger had his own place in the story and some of our hearts long before Radar went home. If i remember right at one point Potter has to essentially tell Max 'Don't try to be Radar. You do you, make your own mark.'
 
Watched it a few times, then 'never again.'

Death is not humorous, dealing with death week after week required some mechanism to continue dealing with torn bodies day after day,
Hawk Eye and others used humor.

Again, death of young men is not funny.

Moreover, what the hell were we doing in Korea. We promoted ourselves to be the world's policemen:-our young men payed the bill.

Politically, it was a Vietnam, but we 'thought' our leaders knew what was needed-they didn't! We trusted our leaders, there were murmurs
of discontent, but flush with now being a superpower like blind pigs we followed without question.
I tend to agree, nothing funny about war and death. MASH was not as bad as say Hogan Heroes.

Although it was set in the Korean War I think it was as much or more about Vietnam. It did have an anti-war leaning.
 
That's hard they all had their place in it. But in terms of characters i would enjoy knowing if real people: Hunnicutt, Potter and Winchester. I felt Potter commanded more respect than Blake and was better as a referree between those at odds with each other than Blake ever was. Also felt Winchester a more fitting and challenging antagonist than Burns. He actually had redeeming qualities.
In comment #29 i put my feelings about the last pair on list. Not really the same as other replacements who were totally new to the Unit and us.
 
Last edited:
I tend to agree, nothing funny about war and death. MASH was not as bad as say Hogan Heroes.

Although it was set in the Korean War I think it was as much or more about Vietnam. It did have an anti-war leaning.
Hogan's Heroes always rubbed me the wrong way. Some trivia I learned on MeTV really surprized me.

'Klemperer (Klink), Banner (Schultz), Leon Askin (Burkhalter) and Howard Caine (Hochstetter) were Jewish, and all but the latter had fled the Nazis during WWII. Additionally, Robert Clary, who played the cooking French corporal, LeBeau, had been interned at a concentration camp.'

I suppose an actor will take any role for the money, but if I was Jewish, I don't think I could play a Nazi. It would just go against my soul.

Sorry about going off topic.
 
Which character did you prefer, the original or the replacement:

Trapper John or B.J. Hunnicutt

Col. Blake or Col. Potter

Maj. Burns or Maj. Winchester

Cpl. O'Reilly or Cpl. Klinger
Tough one, I liked both the originals and the new characters. I liked both Col. Blake and Col. Potter, but Col. Potter seemed more realistic to me, me being an Army veteran. I did not like Major Burns, not even for short moments. Maj. Winchester was alien to me(East coast upper crust snob) but at least he had a heart, and some scruples. Cpl. O'Reilly was the quintessential Army orderly room clerk, who was actually the unofficial company commander. ;) I knew one guy when I was in the Army that was like Klinger...he didn't cross-dress but he was a draftee that was trying his damndest to get out of the Army. He always said he wouldn't mind staying in if he could get transferred to Schenectady Army Depot. I always thought he made that up, but there really was a Schenectady Army Depot...:oops:
 
Trapper John or B.J. Hunnicutt
-- 2 blonde guys, right? I couldn't tell the difference.

Col. Blake or Col. Potter
-- Col. Potter.

Maj. Burns or Maj. Winchester
-- Maj. Winchester.

Cpl. O'Reilly or Cpl. Klinger
-- Cpl. O'Reilly, what a gem. Klinger was good too.
 
If these were candidates running for positions in the 4077 M*A*S*H unit, these would be my results:

B.J. Hunnicutt 53%
Trapper John 47%

Lt. Col. Henry Blake 52%
Col. Sherman Potter 48%

Charles Winchester 65%
Frank Burns 35%

Radar O'Reilly 70%
Maxwell Klinger 30%
 
Just for ducks, here's pics of the MASH cast in high school. Note the actor who played Frank Burns already (bless him) looks like "ferret face" Never could abide Frank. Give me Charles anytime; he's a better foil for Hawkeye

IMG_1088.jpeg
 
If you were in the medical profession, you'd understand the need for a macabre sense of humor after awhile. Some levity eases the heartache we face daily. War is not amusing and I feel it is ultimately and exercise in futility when all is said and done. But we do our best to get through it in any way we know how and medical personnel find their own way, since life is so fragile.
Sometimes called gallows humor and it is a coping mechanism. No one can internalize all the suffering. They'd go insane.
 
Just for ducks, here's pics of the MASH cast in high school. Note the actor who played Frank Burns already (bless him) looks like "ferret face" Never could abide Frank. Give me Charles anytime; he's a better foil for Hawkeye

View attachment 329098
They all look familiar but a couple I can't name. Here's my guesses:

Top: Hunnycut, Winchester, Hawkeye
Middle: Hot Lips, Klinger, Radar
Bottom: Frank, Trapper John, Father Mulcahey?
 
Which character did you prefer, the original or the replacement:

Trapper John or B.J. Hunnicutt

Col. Blake or Col. Potter

Maj. Burns or Maj. Winchester

Cpl. O'Reilly or Cpl. Klinger
Trapper, Potter, Winchester, Klinger. By the way, Klinger did not replace O'Reilly. They were both on until the show ended.
 
Watched it a few times, then 'never again.'

Death is not humorous, dealing with death week after week required some mechanism to continue dealing with torn bodies day after day,
Hawk Eye and others used humor.

Again, death of young men is not funny.

Moreover, what the hell were we doing in Korea. We promoted ourselves to be the world's policemen:-our young men payed the bill.

Politically, it was a Vietnam, but we 'thought' our leaders knew what was needed-they didn't! We trusted our leaders, there were murmurs
of discontent, but flush with now being a superpower like blind pigs we followed without question.
Korea was a U.N. war and since we were members of the U.N., we served along with all the other nations. This was in no way Vietnam and we certainly had no business bringing down the House of Diem. Different politics altogether at play in that disaster.
 
Korea was a U.N. war and since we were members of the U.N., we served along with all the other nations. This was in no way Vietnam and we certainly had no business bringing down the House of Diem. Different politics altogether at play in that disaster.
The film depicts a unit of medical personnel stationed at a Mobile Army Surgical Hospital (MASH) during the Korean War. It stars Donald Sutherland, Tom Skerritt, and Elliott Gould, with Sally Kellerman, Robert Duvall, René Auberjonois, Gary Burghoff, Roger Bowen, Michael Murphy, and in his film debut, professional football player Fred Williamson. Although the Korean War is the film's storyline setting, the subtext is the Vietnam War – a current event at the time the film was made.
 
BJ Hunnicutt caused 9/11.

He feminized what a man should be and after him most American Presidents voted in were were kind or weak-looking. The Terrorists took advantage of this and caused mayhem.
 


Back
Top