math...why haven't you been investing in them, just curious. What do you use in place of that type of stock genre , if anything?Not in many many years .
math...why haven't you been investing in them, just curious. What do you use in place of that type of stock genre , if anything?Not in many many years .
i see no reason to ... my diversified equity funds have better returns , and less risk since they are far more diversified . betting on a sector is a much higher risk game then just the volatility of a diversified etf , fund or index ...math...why haven't you been investing in them, just curious. What do you use in place of that type of stock genre , if anything?
What you are saying then, is that you always make good money, each and every year?i see no reason to ... my diversified equity funds have better returns , and less risk since they are far more diversified . betting on a sector is a much higher risk game then just the volatility of a diversified etf , fund or index ...
people don't realize how risky betting on the whims of a sector can be. a balanced fund has the same beta ( volatility) as many utilities , less risk overall and better long term returns.
the bulk of most sector funds is electric power ... the advent of larger more efficient battery packs and solar panels have been seeing more and more large users go in to generating their own power ... vegas utilities have been getting killed as more and more large users are divorcing themselves from utilities. this is a trend that will continue
no , markets are never consistent year to year in returns , not even utilities .. they are stocks , they are long term investments and generate good returns usually over longer periods of time . even vanguards utility index lost money at times , as well as returns vary . last year it made 4% .... it lost money in 2015 , this year it is up 27%. so there is no such thing as making good money every year. what you want is an acceptable long term average return with an appropriate risk ... buying individual stocks , utilities or not , take on a whole other layer of risk that diversified funds do not have ....namely individual company risk plus market risk as well as utilities have a high amount of interest rate risk too . rising rates are the kryptonite to them since they run on so much borrowed moneyWhat you are saying then, is that you always make good money, each and every year?
Yeah, but with the interest rates being knocked down so much, would think some utilities - like Duke would be good investments for the next few years. Its politics!no , markets are never consistent year to year in returns , not even utilities .. they are stocks , they are long term investments and generate good returns usually over longer periods of time . even vanguards utility index lost money at times , as well as returns vary . last year it made 4% .... it lost money in 2015 , this year it is up 27%. so there is no such thing as making good money every year. what you want is an acceptable long term average return with an appropriate risk ... buying individual stocks , utilities or not , take on a whole other layer of risk that diversified funds do not have ....namely individual company risk plus market risk as well as utilities have a high amount of interest rate risk too . rising rates are the kryptonite to them since they run on so much borrowed money
Yeah, but with the interest rates being knocked down so much, would think some utilities - like Duke would be good investments for the next few years. Its politics!
Think the world's largest battery maker now also needs a recharge...lol.
Yes, but with the feds being "beat on" to continue to "beat down" the rates, it doesn't look good for interests to rise unless the political sector changes.rates stand a pretty good chance of continuing their rise once this trade thing is settled . investors want more interest to take the risk of going out 10-30 years on bonds and it is investors who control bond rates not the fed.
it is irrelevant what the fed wants when it come to bond rates ...that is why we have the inverted yield curve ...the fed wanted higher rates and investors did not see it that way so they bid bond rates lower than the feds rates for short term .Yes, but with the feds being "beat on" to continue to "beat down" the rates, it doesn't look good for interests to rise unless the political sector changes.
Door #1 investment grade bonds - Door #2 Junk bonds!it is irrelevant what the fed wants when it come to bond rates ...that is why we have the inverted yield curve ...the fed wanted higher rates and investors did not see it that way so they bid bond rates lower than the feds rates for short term .
predicting interest rates is much harder than predicting the stock market . so betting on one outcome is very risky compared to a broad based fund .
That little over a year long contrast between A CD & investing was an experiment I wanted to try.short term returns mean little . take ppl for example.
they are having a very good year up 21% ytd . but even with that and reinvesting all dividends, investors saw a mere 4.23% over the last 3 years and 4.94% the last 5 years as an average return , and that is only that high because they had a good year this year .
in contrast to a diversified fund like the s&p 500 which is up 21.86 ytd , 14% the last 3 years and 11.05% the last 5 years.
ppl has had some wild swings too so it isn't like you were spared. there is almost a 20% range in movement
Tax wise selling the dollars in stock or a fund is far more efficient then the company selling off a piece of your value and handing it to you. You are taxed on the entire dividend. Selling a bit of shares has you taxed only on the gainSome good points but you are pointing to one stock vs a fund.
Using your logic, one like me that depends on dividends to supplement our retirement would have to sell some stock for that income...nothing wrong with that but not my cup of tea.
I love to get a utility that pays a good dividend that goes up every year and the stock price also goes up. That is long term investing.
I believe in a diversified portfolio so utilities are only about 45% of it.
Tax wise selling the dollars in stock or a fund is far more efficient then the company selling off a piece of your value and handing it to you. You are taxed on the entire dividend. Selling a bit of shares has you taxed only on the gain
If you pay no taxes then either selling a share amount or them selling a piece of your share value is the same thing ...same cash flow ,same balance"You are taxed on the entire dividend."
You are assuming that everyone pays Federal income taxes. Many that are retired do not. For the last few years we have not. We had our own business and instead of drawing large salaries we put money back into our business so we get only about $1,500.00 a month from SS. Our business was a corporation...we as individuals (not the corporation) owned the building our business was in....income from that we did not pay SS taxes. We sold the building.
Bottom line there are many different situations.
That's what I'm waiting for right now...a nice low price on a good dividend paying utility stock!Use utilities and utility funds for dividends and distributions-income. Every now and then tech related utilities experience bumps, spikes etc that make them a worth buy low sell high stock.
If you pay no taxes then either selling a share amount or them selling a piece of your share value is the same thing ...same cash flow ,same balance