Lewkat
Senior Member
- Location
- New Jersey, USA
Which is what they should be using. Just use sound effects when the trigger is pulled.
Which is what they should be using. Just use sound effects when the trigger is pulled.
I didn't know he was one of the producers. Since he was, then yeah, I agree he bears some responsibility.Baldwin and others face involuntary manslaughter charges. At first, I thought Baldwin didn't even know the gun was loaded, so how could he face charges. But you have to separate Baldwin, the actor from Baldwin, the producer . As the producer of the movie, he is responsible for the safety of the crew. It could be argued that, as producer, Baldwin was negligent in overseeing the prop weapons on his sets.
What do you think?
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/19/ente...ting-alec-baldwin-charges-decision/index.html
Even blanks can be fatal. Terry Kath, the great guitarist from the band Chicago was fooling around with his gun loaded with blanks. Trying to be funny (I guess), he put it to his head and pulled the trigger. The force from the blank shattered his skull and killed him. That was in the late '70s.It's also hard for me to fathom having any live rounds at a movie set. Should be nothing but blanks.
Very, very sloppy and careless. With firearms, that can be fatal.
YupEven blanks can be fatal. Terry Kath, the great guitarist from the band Chicago was fooling around with his gun loaded with blanks. Trying to be funny (I guess), he put it to his head and pulled the trigger. The force from the blank shattered his skull and killed him. That was in the late '70s.
No matter the circumstance or your positionWhat do you think?
Agreed.Here's how guns should be handled in movies... EMPTY! You can see right there and at 1:23 that there are no bullets in Clint Eastwood's gun. When he pulls the trigger he's acting like there's a kick; he's not really firing anything. Sound effects are added later.
yupI think when one handles a gun, he takes on the responsibility,
the obligation to make sure it's handled correctly.
That's why what makes sense to me is what I read previously - that during breaks, they were target shooting at cans behind the set & didn't check all 6 of the gun's chambers before rehearsing.This was a rehearsal, so why was anything at all in the chamber of that weapon?
And, did you catch that firearms error in the final part of that scene when Clint cocks the revolver & pulls the trigger after the actor says "I gots to know?" You'll notice that when Clint pulls the trigger, the gun's cylinder turns - which doesn't happen on any revolver after it's cocked - unless it's not functioning correctly.Here's how guns should be handled in movies... EMPTY! You can see right there and at 1:23 that there are no bullets in Clint Eastwood's gun. When he pulls the trigger he's acting like there's a kick; he's not really firing anything. Sound effects are added later.
Hah!And, did you catch that firearms error in the final part of that scene when Clint cocks the revolver & pulls the trigger after the actor says "I gots to know?" You'll notice that when Clint pulls the trigger, the gun's cylinder turns - which doesn't happen on any revolver after it's cocked - unless it's not functioning correctly.
The S&W Model 29 44 Magnum was in short supply when that movie was made, so the gun used was actually a .41 Magnum (same frame & cylinder size as the 44). And it was made up with spare parts & the armorer probably figured no one would notice that the cylinder didn't lock up properly.
The producers were right to think no one would notice. I'm a gun guy & I only noticed it when I played that scene in slow motion.Hah!
I didn't notice...
The damned thing about firearms is that a minor error can be irreversible.So here’s what I heard on the news today. Why was there a live round on the set? Because the crew was shooting beer cans as recreation. That, in itself, is not so bad, if you’re doing it safely. But if you’re on a movie set with lots of weapons, how easy would it be to get things confused? Who thought that was ok?
That's why a gun has to be checked every time it changes hands or is moved. Gun people already know that & it's a habit, just like "safe direction." And, when someone says, "Hey, can I check out your gun?" it's checked again and the gun is handed to someone with the action open so both individuals can see that it's safe.So here’s what I heard on the news today. Why was there a live round on the set? Because the crew was shooting beer cans as recreation. That, in itself, is not so bad, if you’re doing it safely. But if you’re on a movie set with lots of weapons, how easy would it be to get things confused? Who thought that was ok?
Key word: "If." I couldn't accidentally shoot anyone because I'm not careless or reckless.Ask yourself one question, if it was you and you accidently shot and killed someone would you be charged ?
I agree with all you've said. I'll add that even after I've seen it, taken possession of it, I *still* treat it as if it was loaded.That's why a gun has to be checked every time it changes hands or is moved. Gun people already know that & it's a habit, just like "safe direction." And, when someone says, "Hey, can I check out your gun?" it's checked again and the gun is handed to someone with the action open so both individuals can see that it's safe.
Professional shooters who spend hours & hours practicing both with live ammo and dry firing at home don't have such accidents because firearms safety becomes a habit: