Can the GOP be any more obvious

AZ Jim

R.I.P. With Us In Spirit Only
They have such a poor field of candidates that apparently there in no low they won't sink to in an effort to derail her campaign.

[h=1]Republicans ask IRS to audit Clinton charity's finances[/h] news.yahoo.com/u-republicans-ask-irs-audit-clinton-charitys-finances-001835332.html
By Jonathan Allen 2 hours ago . View photo

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during the "Fighting for Us" town …



By Jonathan Allen
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Republican Party filed a formal complaint against one of Hillary Clinton's family charities with the Internal Revenue Service on Tuesday and is calling for an audit after the charity said this week it would not refile erroneous tax returns.
The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation's flagship health program conceded earlier this year it had misreported by millions of the dollars the money it was given by governments compared with non-government donors in its tax returns for 2012 and 2013.

The charities have come under intense scrutiny this year with Hillary Clinton remaining the favorite to become the Democratic Party's nominee in the November 2016 presidential election.

The Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) originally said it was amending the forms, known as form 990s, after Reuters discovered the errors in the spring. This week, CHAI said it had decided against refiling, saying the errors had "no material impact," CHAI spokeswoman Maura Daley said.

The Republican National Committee disagrees, its chairman, Reince Priebus, said on Tuesday in his letter to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, a copy of which was given to Reuters.

"The American people deserve to know whether the largest philanthropic arm of the Clinton Foundation continues to misreport the funds it receives from foreign governments, and whether this might lead to the potential for further conflicts of interest," Priebus wrote.
Daley declined to comment beyond repeating that CHAI "does not believe a refiling is necessary." CHAI says the total amount of income was correctly reported for both years, but the breakdown of government against non-government funding had been muddled up.

Spokesmen for Hillary Clinton did not respond to requests for comment.

Republicans have said the charities, which rely heavily on foreign government funding for their work on health, educational and environmental projects, present a hopeless conflict of interest for Clinton, who has dismissed this as a baseless political attack. She severed her formal ties with the charities after announcing her candidacy in April, but her husband and daughter continue to have leading roles.
The criticism intensified in April after the charities conceded that they did not fully comply with the ethics agreement Clinton signed with Barack Obama's incoming presidential administration in 2008 in order for her to become his secretary of state.


A spokesman for the IRS said charities should refile a form 990 if it becomes aware of an error. Federal law bans the IRS from discussing specific cases, and it remains unclear whether it will agree that an audit of CHAI is necessary.

While it is not unusual for charities to refile a form 990 on occasion and that doing so is not evidence of wrongdoing, several tax experts told Reuters it was odd for a charity to make large mistakes several years in row. CHAI had previously refiled its 2010 and 2011 tax returns after over-reporting the amount it received from government grants by tens of millions of dollars.

The form 990s are used by the IRS to ensure a charity is not in breach of its tax-exempt status, and the forms must be made public so people can see how a charity raises and spends money.

The Clinton Foundation, which files tax returns separately from CHAI, also said earlier this year it expected to refile three erroneous tax returns after Reuters found it had wrongly reported receiving nothing from foreign governments in 2010, 2011 and 2012. A foundation spokesman told news website Politico, which first reported CHAI's decision not to refile, this week that it was still reviewing its accounts for those years.

(Reporting by Jonathan Allen; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
 

Do I see another "hearing" and more wasted tax payer money being spent.

Ya know... If I personally wouldn't suffer from what Republicans have in store for us regarding our SS and Medicare, I would almost wish that folks voting for these Aholes would be given a taste on what they plan to do to them.. See what they think when their healthcare is limited or they are priced out of the market... and how they survive without a SS check.

For example... Kentucky just voted in a Republican Governor... who ran on the OBAMA is a big bad socialist ticket.. Kentucky is now going to lose their Medicaid expansion and millions will lose their healthcare.. But hey.. if they voted for a Republican.. GOOD! They deserve it.. People are undeniably stupid.
 
[h=1]Many GOP voters on board with impeaching Hillary Clinton[/h]Many GOP voters on board with impeaching Hillary Clinton
Steve Benen
MSNBC

It was just two weeks ago that Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) raised the prospect of impeaching Hillary Clinton, even though she hasn’t been elected. The far-right congressman is apparently so concerned about her email server management that he believes she would, literally on her inauguration day, be “subject to impeachment because she has committed high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Soon after, the Alabama Republican talked to MSNBC’s Steve Kornacki about his intentions, and Brooks seemed quite sincere about impeaching Clinton, despite the fact that she hasn’t, in reality, even been accused of breaking any laws.

And while this is obviously just one unhappy congressman, Public Policy Polling asked North Carolina Republicans for their thoughts on the matter.

If Hillary Clinton is elected President, would you support or oppose impeaching her the day she takes office?

* Support impeaching Hillary Clinton the day she takes office: 66%
* Oppose impeaching Hillary Clinton the day she takes office: 24%
* Not sure: 10%​



......the GOP are beyond ridiculous in their hate for the Clintons and their witch hunts.
 

For GAWD's sake... These people are pathetic.

There's an old saying.. "people DESERVE exactly what they vote for". Gonna be a whole lot of blood tears in their future. Sadly.. it will impact all of us.
 
The blood tears will come when Medicare goes away and they are presented with a $6,000 voucher to purchase health insurance.. and the insurance company wants $12,000. So they will need to pay the difference or accept inferior and limited care.. Or when the insurance company goes back to denying for pre-existing conditions because that hateful devil Obamacare has been repealed.. Should be interesting.. lol!!
 
Sigh, we can only hope that they will become so stupid that they will hoist themselves with their own petard.
 
I cannot recall in my years a political party going to the extreme measures the Repubs are to try and undermine a declared candidate for President. It is beyond disgusting.
 
Again, I say wait till s-----, I have been beat up for saying that word so I won't right now. I will just say wait till April to see just who is really running for each party and maybe independent too.

Too many Republican candidates at this time and not enough for the Democrat party. Wait and see when the campaign really gets started.
 
Again, I say wait till s-----, I have been beat up for saying that word so I won't right now. I will just say wait till April to see just who is really running for each party and maybe independent too.

Too many Republican candidates at this time and not enough for the Democrat party. Wait and see when the campaign really gets started.
Nothing will happen other than some drop outs. The fields are set. It most likely will be Hillary vs Carson or Rubio.
 
You are so right. The whole GOP group is pathetic and I could not bring my self to vote for anyone of them, and yet, at this point, I don't see any Dem that has me excited either. What to do?
 
I believe those who would be best for the country and not the least bit interested in running for the office under the present political climate.
 

Back
Top